Skip to main content

Wonder who wrote this? Paul Krugman would suggest the author is an insincere racist

"There is no disagreement that we need action by our government, a recovery plan that will help jumpstart the economy."
--President Barack Obama

With all due respect Mr.President, that is not true.

Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we the undersigned do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan’s “lost decade” in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policymakers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.


According to Paul Krugman, just the fact that that whoever wrote this opposes government activism and a new New Deal, makes them suspect as arguing in bad faith, and possibly even a racist.

Unfortunately for Dr. Krugman, the signatories of this statement include over 200 well-regarded, published, academic economists at some of the most prestigious universities in the country (not to mention three from the University of Delaware).

Oh, I also forgot to mention that three of these economists are--like Krugman himself--Nobel Laureates.

Damn. Who knew that the Economics Departments of Rutgers, the University of Virginia, University of Michigan (Flint), Ball State, Duke, Indiana, Auburn, Chicago, New Haven, Kent State, and dozens of others were filled with people of bad faith who might be racists.



Oh, just in case you are tempted to write this off, it is important to remember that about 125 of these economists (including all three Nobel Laureates) sent a petition to Congress back during September, pointing out that the original bail-out package was ill-considered and would not deliver what was promised. So they asked:

For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come.


But we had to act instantly, or the world would end--even though four months later we don't know precisely what happened to the first half of the money and we haven't yet spent the second half.

I'd say to beware of people who tell you that we don't have time to investigate the implications of all the money we're about to spend (or borrow from the Chinese)...

... but it's too late for that.

The Pork-out passed the House today.

[h/t Disloyal Opposition]

Comments

Anonymous said…
OK...does anyone recall the "Dissent is Patriotic" mantra chanted about five short years ago? It's apparently been conveniently forgotten. While the opposition voice is more flaccid than a boiled spaghetti noodle in this Congress, there is no doubt that the roles of deep partisan bickering have changed, including the merciless and sharp angry criticism from the majority.
Anonymous said…
"not to mention three from the University of Delaware"

Shout out to Burton Abrams, Stacie Beck and William Poole! I don't know Beck or Poole, but Abrams was one of my favorite MBA profs - truly a genius in the field, and a Greg Mankiw disciple to boot.
Brian Miller said…
They're going to do to the entire country what was done in California. If you get a check from government, expect to get an IOU... and then later, the government monetizing all the losses with the printing press.
Mike W. said…
And of course, as those economists predicted the original baliout failed.

What was the response from Congress? More bailouts. It's the old "Do it again only harder!" approach.

They ignored the economists because they don't really care whether this stimulates the economy. They just want to be seen as "doing something" for political reasons only.

They're using a crisis (partially manufactured I might add) in order to push their own selfish agenda. In other words, they're engaging in typical political BS. I'm sure you've read some of what's included in this so-called "stimulus" and are just as disgusted with it as I am.

Change? heaping debt upon future generations so you can give kickbacks to every special interest you can think of isn't change, it's politics as usual. Not much has changed other than which party is in power.
Brian Miller said…
as those economists predicted the original baliout failed

Wouldn't it be great if Katie Couric or Sam Donaldson or SOMEONE asked one of the bailout proponents WHY this proposed bailout will work any better than the last two?

There's a great new plan from Obama for a "bad bank." It will buy up toxic assets from banks with borrowed government cash and "secure" them in a government entity.

Sound familiar?

Oh yeah. That was the whole rationale for TARP in the first place -- except when they got the money, they declared that it wouldn't work and abandoned it shortly after the bill passed.

you can think of isn't change, it's politics as usual

Oh, I disagree. It's all about change. In fact, change will be all most of us have left when they're finished.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba