Skip to main content

UPDATED:Separate but Equal: A Token Pat on the Head for the LGBT Community at the Inauguration

UPDATE: Just to make it clear there is no love lost whatever between Gene Robinson and Rick Warren (and to further accentuate the rather cynical diviseness instead of some chimerical, open-minded psalm to diversity on the part of Barack Obama), here's Rick Warren offering Saddleback Church as a new home to those worried about Gene Robinson and his infestation of queers in the Episcopal Church. (Oops, sorry Sunlit Uplands. Was using the word queers too coarse for you?) Take it away, Rick:

... [The Episcopal Church has] already considered me an adversary after partnering on projects with Kolini, Orumbi, and Nzimbi, and writing the TIME bio on Akinola.

But since last summer... I’ve been on Gene Robinson and other’s attack list for my position on gay marriage. ....[Our] brothers and sisters here at St. James in Newport Beach lost their California State Supreme Court case to keep their property.

We stand in solidarity with them, and with all orthodox, evangelical Anglicans. I offer the campus of Saddleback Church to any Anglican congregation who need a place to meet, or if you want to plant a new congregation in south Orange County.

[h/t Waldo]

We now take you back to the original post:

HuPo reports that openly gay Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson has been invited to give the opening prayer at the Sunday, January 18, pre-inauguration event at the Lincoln Memorial.

Many liberal commentators, having been previously been left without much of a comeback to protests by the gay community, have grasped this face-saving move as new evidence of President-elect Barack Obama's political acumen. Local reaction among our liberal friends is to suggest that Obama is Crazy like a fox.

Some fox. More like the naked emperor grabbing for a jock strap.

I understand that Robinson could not afford to turn down this invitation, but his comments about Rick Warren are instructive:

Robinson said he would love to sit down with Rick Warren but believed that the California pastor has "perpetrated lies about the gay, lesbian and bisexual community."


This is, frankly, nothing but more than a Separate but Equal patting on the head of the LGBT community. It says, You're good enough for a side show, but for the main event we're sticking with the guy who is anti-gay and anti-science, who thinks people get cancer because of sin.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I had the same impression, I was just surprised how long it took for them to find someone to fall for the political ploy.
Delaware Watch said…
It's pure tokenism, plain & simple.
Brian Miller said…
So much for the "acumen" of the Obama political machine. Heh.
Bowly said…
Steve +1, DelLib +0, which makes the score something in the neighborhood of a jillion to zero.
Anonymous said…
Allow me to give some insight, since I do respect your opinion. When I read the story my first thought was that Warren was going to be pissed because he'd be sharing the spotlight with a gay bishop, that from this moment on whenever anyone spoke about prayer at the inauguration they wouldn't be focusing solely on Warren. I thought of all the uncomfortable questions Warren was about to be asked, and savored watching him squirm trying to appease his base while simultaneously moving into the "mainstream."

My thoughts were on Warren's reaction. How will he handle this situation? Can he make everyone happy - especially followers who will expect him to speak out against Robinson? If he does speak out what happens to that mainstream appeal he so desperately seeking? If he doesn't speak out what happens to his flock's devotion?

None of this means I was happy with the Warren pick, nor does it allow me to dismiss everyone's comments. You all have extremely valid points - which I agree with and should have included in my hastily written (narrowly focused) post.
Delaware Watch said…
Frankly, Pandora, I could care less about Warren's reaction. I think it's irrelevant to the only matter worthy of our care: viz., what is the message being sent to homosexual Americans by having Warren offer a prayer at the Inauguration.
Brian Miller said…
And Gene Robinson, let's not forget, was a bit of a patsy for Obama during the Dems' nomination fight (and the election).

Having one of your apologists show up on stage is hardly "reaching out."

And let's not forget all the nonbelievers (or nontheists, pantheists, multitheists, etc.) who also get locked out of the process.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...