Skip to main content

Here's an immediate action to help the struggling: remove taxation from bartered exchanges...

... not that I know anybody who actually pays taxes on this anyway, but it would be nice to decriminalize the process.

The NJ has a story today on how people are turning to bartered exchanges in tough times, which includes this segment:

Bartering can be less expensive than buying because there are few overhead costs for rent or staff. However, not all costs are eliminated. The IRS considers barter dollars as identical to real currency for tax reporting, and barterers must obtain a special form, the 1099-B.


Want change I can believe in?

Stop ripping off private individuals who exchange goods for which both parties have already paid.
Labels:

Comments

City Upon The Hill said…
I don't know dawg, I think this could be abused. What if I "bartered" with the grocery store to exchange 20 dollars worth of groceries with an envelope that just happened to contain 20 dollars?
March 2, 2009 at 2:06 PM
a most peculiar nature said…
LOL, City.

But something interesting....we have sold a few things on Craigs List (my husband does the work; I can't deal with it), and he has noticed that more and more people are wanting to "trade", let's say, a motorcycle for a car, or vice-versa. I think we'll see more of that.
March 2, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Brian Miller said…
You'll see a LOT more of it, especially when you consider the soaring sales and income taxes at a state and local level that are passing as of late.

Only politicians could be dumb enough to pass massive tax increases in a killer recession... but people will adapt.
March 2, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Anonymous said…
If the government wants to tax my barter, by damn I will insist on payin' with the economy of my goods. We barter because we are product, or service abled, and either cash shy or short. If Uncle Sam wants the tax on six dozen eggs for an oil change, just tell me where to throw them.
March 2, 2009 at 10:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more