Skip to main content

A few laughers from the 2008 Democratic Party Platform for those of you who think those national platforms matter

One commenter here (who shall remain anonymous) thinks it is a cute exercise to quote either the Libertarian Party platform, or the Green Party platform, or any other cherry-picked item to challenge the legitimacy of anyone who would self-identify as anything other than one of the major Demopublican flavors.   

Libertarians are dangerous because they want to eliminate civil rights or public education; look, it says so right here in the platform, and if you don't subscribe to every word of your platform then how can you claim to be a Libertarian.

So let's take a look at some of the promises and positions from the Democratic Party Platform of 2008 that turned out to be, ah, problematic"
"We will eliminate all Federal income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000 per year."

"Our Children's First Agenda, including increases in Head Start and Early Head Start. . . ."

"We will make an unprecedented investment to provide teachers with better pay . . . ."

"We need . . . to promote public charter schools that are accountable . . . ."

"We support full funding of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act."

"We will start a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank . . . ."

"We will strengthen privacy protections in the digital age and will harness the power of technology to hold government and business accountable for violations of personal privacy."

"We will maintain fiscal responsibility so that we do not mortgage our children's future on a mountain of debt."

"We will not increase taxes on any family earning under $250,000. . . ."

"We will insure that savings incentives are fair to all workers by matching half of the initial $1,000 of savings for families that need help. . . ."

"America cannot afford to continue to run up huge deficits. . . ."

"We will not raise taxes on people making less that $250,000, and we will eliminate Federal Income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000."

"We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO--including necessary assets like satellites and predator drones . . . ."

"We must also be willing to consider using military force in circumstances beyond self-defense. . . ."

"We support plans to increase the size of the Army by 65,000 troops, and the Marines by 27,000 troops."

"We will aggressively address Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury [among our veterans]."

"We will double our annual investment [in the UN Milennial Development Goals]."

"We will make it a top priority to reduce oil consumption by at least 35%, or ten million barrels per day, by 2030."

"We cannot continue to allow people to enter the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked."

"We will repeal the prohibition on negotiating prescription drug prices . . . ."

"The government we create will . . . protect our civil liberties."

"We will pay for our new spending . . . ."

"We will close the revolving door that has allowed people to use their position in the Adminstration as a stepping-stone to further their lobbying careers."

"We reject the use of national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspeted of a crime.  We reject the tracking of citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war.  We reject torture.  We reject sweeping claims of 'inherent' Presidential power.  We will revisit the Patriot Act and overturn unconstitutional executive decisions issued during the past eight years.  We will not use signing statements to nullify or undermine duly enacted law."

"We will close the detention camp in Guatanamo Bay. . . "

So I'm wondering just how President Obama gets to claim he is a Democrat, if he didn't carry through on so many critical planks of the Democratic Platform?

Cause, you see, if he's not a Democrat, then I guess he'll have to come clean and run as an independent.

National party platforms don't matter worth spit, which is why nobody but trolls and people with too little else to occupy their time ever go back and read them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba