Skip to main content

23 Minutes of Debate, a NY Times Article, and Personal Anecdotes...

...are all it takes for the deplorably-statist Wilmington, Delaware City Council nannies to add a new primary motor vehicle offense (i.e. one for which you can be stopped) to the books. In this case, the offense is using a hand-held mobile telephone.

The sponsor of this new added enforcement responsibility for our city police, in the midst of out-of-control violent crime, is the Baker Democrat (as in Mayor Jim Baker) in phony Republican garb : At-Large Wilmington City Councilman Michael A. Brown.

You might remember Brown from his laughable proposal to ban saggy pants in the City or his even more ridiculous proposal for a program to offer firearms turn-in for coupons to places like Home Depot. Brown also bloviated when voting for eminent domain for private developer benefit that God told him to vote for it.

[Prayer break : God, please tell this man to stop masquerading as a Republican.]

Of course this same Council, whose eminent domain bullying and excesses led to new state law protections against such abuses, chose to ignore one of the more reasonable and informed voices on Council, former Wilmington police officer Stephen Martelli.

Martelli, like Councilman Ignudo, warned of "over-legislation" and stated that eating food while driving causes somewhere in the neighborhood of 80% of inattentive driving accidents.

Martelli called the legislation "window-dressing" and said that if they are going to proscribe mobile phone use in cars they should just ban it completely, hands-free or otherwise. He noted that we already have an inattentive driving offense in Title 21.

Martelli stated that distracted driving, if any, involving use of a mobile phone comes not from holding the phone but from irresponsibly engaging in a conversation at the expense of paying attention to driving, something this new law does not address.

[Martelli is consistently convincing me that he is mayoral material and a Democrat worth elevating to greater responsibilities in Wilmington government. From much I have already seen, he has a very common sense approach to lawmaking and government power....from a citizen's perspective rather than from high up on-high, down in the French Street government cocoon.]

Given the extent of vehicle cell phone use, even just visibly, on the roads it is actually quite a testament to the widespread and prevailing nature of responsible use that there are so few accidents, at least if we are to buy the nanny teeth-gnashing that this danger demands a new arrestable offense.

Of course, not one proponent of this ordinance cited a single Delaware or Wilmington statistic concerning this supposed problem, or anything really but a NY Times article, to back their claims of an imperative to legislate and fine the citizenry yet more and more and more and more...

Councilwoman Loretta Walsh's comments were particularly deplorable and disturbing from a civil liberties perspective, as well as from a meddling paternalism (or should I say, maternalism) standpoint.

You can hear Walsh's remarks below, but suffice to say they are completely out-of-touch with the modern realities of how people can responsibly operate motor vehicles and still use electronic devices (like their radio or climate control systems - not exactly new devices in cars).

Walsh's hyperbolic nanny ethos are remarkable. In the News-Journal she calls motor vehicles "deadly weapons". In the Council debate she calls text messaging a "fatal" aspect of today's youth culture.

[Sheesh, Loretta, have a Coke and a smile for a minute. Life isn't all worrying about death.]

But of course, Walsh's mindset is clearly one of legislating and burdening the responsible mass of drivers (and pull in some revenues, while they're at it) around the rare instances of irresponsible idiocy.

And Bud Freel.....well.....Bud Freel....need I say more? (Bud chimed in with the typical "save the children", or rather "save MY children" tripe.)

Other voices of reason joining Martelli on the losing side of the 8-4 vote were my own councilman Sammy Prado (cheers, Sammy!), as well as Paul Ignudo, and Hanifa Shabazz. Kudos to them for not being self-righteous hypocrites chasing fad legislation to burden citizens with yet more intrusive poppcockery like this.

Joining the sponsor, Baker-Democrat-Crowding-Out-Any-Real Republican-From-Council Mike Brown, on the busybody do-somethingitis side of the equation were :

Wannabe Mayor Norm Griffiths
Loretta "it gives police another tool to stop 'suspicious' vehicles" Walsh
Bud "Save MY Children" Freel
Kevin "Let's Bust Some Heads" Kelley
Ernest "Trippi" Congo
Justen Wright - (big disappointment from these two new Councilmen)
Charles (even bigger disappointment on this issue) Potter

[Technical Note : the Blogger upload process appears to have caused the video to gradually go out of sync with audio as the clips progress. Sorry for that, but the audio is nonetheless clear.]






Stephen Martelli's Remarks And the Vote

Comments

Thank you for chronicling this, Tyler. I elicited some controversial feedback regarding this on a Facebook status I posted. I'm so sick of this bullshit Big Brother nanny-statism.
Did Mike Brown say "This isn't about BANDing cell phones?" And is that dude a councilman or a friggin' preacher? What an embarrassment.
Tyler Nixon said…
There are lot of things Mike Brown says that are non-sequiturs or just plain don't make sense. Personally, I long ago lost track.

Good to see you coming by, Mike!
Anonymous said…
Wilmington should make shooting people to death a crime. That would improve the quality of life. Of course they might have to change the city motto away from "A place to be some body."

But seriously folks. Good laws can be proposed by dumb people. It is crazy out there. In fact, I'm texting this from my blackberry while driving down Delaware Ave and th...

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?