Skip to main content

Double standards on health care? Try triple....

.... which is what you get when, after accepting a $150 million advertising buy-in from the pharmaceutical companies in exchange for putting an upper limit on what reform could cost them, President Obama decides to hold a high-level, one-on-one consultation with former Senator Tom Daschle in the Oval Office:

According to the White House, Obama and Daschle "agreed that substantive reform that lowers costs, reforms the insurance industry, and expands coverage is too important to wait another year or another administration, and they agreed to stay in touch over the coming weeks and months as this critical effort moves forward."


Of course, this required significant spin, as WaPo reports, due to the inconvenient fact that Daschle's law firm represents one of the largest private insurers that is dead opposed to such reforms:

But Daschle is also working closely with lobbyists, through his job at the Alston and Bird law firm, as an adviser to United Health Group, one of the nation's largest insurance companies. The insurance industry opposes the public option.

White House aides said that Daschle's corporate work does not present a conflict of interest and that Obama counts the former Senate leader as a confidant. "The president knows and expects that, when he asks Senator Daschle a question, that he's getting the opinion of Senator Daschle and not anybody else," press secretary Robert Gibbs said.


Yeah. Sure, Bob.

But just what is United Health Group doing, based on the sage advice of legal counsel?

TPM:

At least one major insurer is urging its employees to participate in tea parties.

Last week, UnitedHealth Group--the second largest health insurance company in the country--sent out a letter to its employees urging them to call UHG's United for Health Reform Advocacy Hotline to speak with an advocacy specialist about health care reform. The advocacy specialist, according to the letter, is there to help UHG employees write personalized messages to elected officials, and to arm them with talking points to use at local events in order to better oppose the public health insurance option.


I tend to prefer Nancy Willing's characterization of Tom Daschle as a Greedy Two-faced Shill for Big Health Insurance.

Here's the deal that the Demopublicans don't want to acknowledge ... yet.

There will be health insurance reform passed this year, because the major constituencies, which are health insurance and pharmaceutical companies have now come on board through direct access to the President of the United States.

All of you out there who were hoping for a robust public option or single-payer are not actually considered stakeholders because you have not brought enough money or influence to the table.

Comments

Nancy Willing said…
I am glad you wrote this. When I saw the spin being spun in the news today I 'bout puked and didn't read any of it.

The guy is a total tool...and unfortunately that goes for most current members of Congress.

There was an interesting convo on Eschaton this afternoon about how to control election $$. One contribution:

What i think: that little box we check when we pay our taxes? that's all the money that should be spent on political campaigns. we should also mandate that teevee has to show so much political campaign time, limited to about 6 weeks before elections, for all qualifying parties, equally. and no more. every state should allocate a small fraction of a percentage of their budgets for political campaigns, which is distributed equally among all state candidates. i know this will take a Constitutional Amendment to accomplish, but i think it's time. I'll add that web based political ads should continue to be unregulated, and that "issue advocacy" advertising on teevee should also be highly regulated.

chicago dyke

We can dream, can't we? It's either control the terms or control the money. I also don't think that there should be pensions offered to elected officials. Elected Office shouldn't be a damned career.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?