Skip to main content

ACLU vs Al Qaeda: This is the most dangerous organization in America

Quoth David Anderson at Delaware Politics:

The ACLU has done more damage to America than any other organization. It has distorted the liberty protections of the Constitution into chains of oppression whenever it is allowed to go unchecked.


I looked into it, and by God he's right. Look at what that commie bastard scum group has been up to lately:

ACLU files brief on behalf of Fox News against FCC fining the network for fleeting expletives in live broadcasts.

ACLU goes to court to keep Yup'ik-speaking American citizens in Alaska from being disenfranchised by the State government in violation of the Voting Rights Act.

ACLU challenges repressive law in Annapolis MD that gives the government the power to say who you may and may not have as a guest in your own home.

ACLU advocates for disabled public school students who, research shows, suffer corporal punishment at a far greater rate than non-disabled students.

ACLU leads the fight to give States, not the Drug Enforcement Administration, the power to make decisions on the use of medica marijuana.

ACLU argues that Congress should end the sentence of life without possibility of parole for children.

Oppression all around.

Thanks for keeping us safe from the Constitution, David.

Oh: and just in case you forgot, David: the ACLU cannot legislate nor hand down judicial decisions. They actually have to work within the existing system and convince other people--judges and legislators--to make the changes they propose.

Again: too much nuance on my part for either wing of the Demopublican Party.

Comments

Ed Heath said…
Demopublican Party....I like Republicrat better!
townie 76 said…
Steve do you think David Anderson has ever read the Constitution? If he had he would know the ACLU is exactly what you stated, an advocate for those without a voice and for whom society has contempt.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?