Skip to main content

Dana Rohrabacher's America is not mine


You can almost imagine the delight on Eric "All Real Libertarians are Republican conservatives" Dondero's face as he wrote the recent post about Rohrabacher gets it right! Putting panties on a Terrorist Suspect's head does not constitute "Torture".

In it, Dondero quotes the Newsmax story:

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher on Wednesday dismissed the idea that taunting terrorism suspects with women's panties is a form of torture.

In a debate about detainee treatment at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the California Republican cited panties eight times, arguing that making suspected terrorists wear women's underwear on their heads isn't demeaning and degrading enough to be called torture.

"You're suggesting that the behavior of, what, panties on his head ... is unacceptable interrogation technique for a man who was involved in a conspiracy to kill tens of thousands of Americans?" Rohrabacher asked during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing.

Rohrabacher was taking issue with FBI complaints about inappropriate and potentially illegal tactics used to get al-Qaida detainees to talk in the years following the Sept. 11 attacks. He said interrogation-by-panties was more akin to a "hazing pranks from some fraternity," not torture.


This is my favorite line: making suspected terrorists wear women's underwear on their heads isn't demeaning and degrading enough to be called torture.

Let me explain something to the intellectually and ethically challenged Dondero and Rohrabacher:

The United States did not find it necessary to torture enemy prisoners in World War Two, the largest and most desperate conflict in world history. We did not torture Hermann Goering or Wilhelm Keitel. The Israelis did not torture Adolf Eichmann. We did not torture people during the Cold War, when our enemies possessed the power to kill more than 100 million Americans in 90 minutes.

Even though the founding premise of Libertarianism is non-aggression, I don't claim my position results from that. It comes from something more basic.

As an American I want to belong to a society that is too stinking proud to torture our prisoners.

No, scratch that. I demand to belong to a society that is too stinking proud to torture our prisoners.

I don't generally adopt the position taken by many Libertarians who purport to have the right to exclude or include anyone else as a Libertarian based on their own beliefs, but in this case I will make an exception: neither Dana Rohrabacher nor Eric Dondero has a legitimate claim on an ideology that foreswears aggression and harm to others.

Comments

David said…
I couldn't disagree with you more strongly. You make a joke of what people who have been tortured have been through.

This was not U.S. policy, but we don't need to exaggerate to say that it shouldn't have happened. It is important that we distinguish between serious actions and trivial ones.

I have no problem with rare but aggressive interrogation by the CIA to save innocent lives when time is of the essence. I find it hard to understand the opposition. Let thousands of innocents die to allow their killer to feel good about himself. That is immoral.

Alan Dershowitz proposed the best balance. His plan should be adopted.
David
I assure you I do not intend a joke here.

You cite the favorite scenario of "aggressive interrogation": the ticking time bomb.

Two thoughts:

1) Why has this never been necessary in US history as policy prior to 2001? Don't try to give me the answer that the threat has never been greater, because it simply doesn't wash.

2) Show me a single verifiable example of the ticking time bomb scenario at work in which these techniques saved lives. Just one. Torture experts can't find one; all of the CIA released material for enhanced interrogations--all of them--were about background information and not actionable intelligence.

Torture (a) doesn't work reliably and (b) doesn't get used for the scenarios its advocates say it will.

When you've got evidence, bring it.

Until that point, your position places you in league with people like Rorhabacher and Dondero--and at odds with, let's see--every announced Presidential candidate from ANY party.
Anonymous said…
Excellent, Steve. Taking the high road is in our nation's DNA. Even during the revolutionary war, when the British were torturing American prisoners, George Washington refused to torture British prisoners. The only way that Americans will be in as great danger as we were during the revolutionary war is if we continue to help the fascists recruit more terrorists by doing immoral things ourselves.
Eric Dondero said…
Guess listening to Heavy Metal music is considered "torture" by today's modern standards.

Wonder if listening to Swing would have been considered torture, if American Troops had forced captured German soldiers in WWII?

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba