Skip to main content

Is anarchy a workable philosophy? The answer from science fiction....

Two of my favorite SF authors--for completely different reasons--are the later A E Van Vogt and Larry Niven.

Niven is the acknowledged dean of hard SF, while van Vogt was famous for the often dream-like quality of his stories.

Both writers have dealt with the interesting question of whether society could survive in a state of anarchy: Van Vogt with his 1977 novel The Anachronistic Colossus and Niven with the short story "Cloak of Anarchy" (which you can read in its entirety here).

Curiously, both arrived at the same conclusion: for anarchy to work, there has to exist an impartial authority with the power to prevent or punish transgressions.

Both use ubiquitous monitoring systems that are in virtually every public space, with the power to zap the perpetrators of force or fraud before--or immediately after--they commit an act of aggression.

Both systems are designed to run normally without human intervention.

Both systems are designed to allow you to do pretty much whatever you want, unless you set out to hurt somebody else.

Niven explores what happens when the system breaks down and people are free to transgress without possibility of witness or retribution; van Vogt deals in how an anarchistic society might actually be able to defend itself from an alien invasion.

There are two particular points of interest here: one is the idea that a non-violent anarchistic society could not exist until the decentralized technology to enforce that non-violence (detached from a government through automation) has evolved. I don't know that I like this conclusion: I'm still pretty damn unhappy about automated cameras at stoplights with the ability to send me a ticket, as well as facial recognition software employed in the so-called War on Terror.

The second significant point is that nothing in the technologies proposed by van Vogt or Niven is more than a few years down the pike. That's genuinely scary, because that leap I cannot make with them is the leap to a disinterested, incorruptible system for enforcing bans on aggression. What I see instead are State and Corporations given the perfect Gestapo-like tools of control and using them.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Short answer- NO. Anarachy always historically leads to a dictatorship. Anarchy is the worst possible system. It is an interregium of uncontrolled human ambition. Unless people have self-government, then government is constituted as a "necessary evil"- according to our founding documents.

For people to be self governed there must be some level of respect for the ancestors, filial piety, social stability and financial equality.

The systems of government that work the best are two: 1. Constitutional Republicanism as defined by William Penn and 2. Confucian Mututal Benefit as defined in the Analects.

The first is relatively new and is a development of the enlightenment and Quakerism and Freemasonry, the second dates from what? Circa 550-600BC but is pre-dated to about 3779 BC by the development of a system of filial piety and respect for the ancestors.

Those are the systems of government that work.

Anarchy is a deplorable dark age, becuase as our founder fathers warned us, "men are not angels" and until we practice being good as well as being efficent, no self-regulated system will come into existence, and without mutual benefit where each individual benefits the other and works for the fulfillment of their potential as well as our own, it is impossible to speak about the idea of not living under government.

To me anarchy means that the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must and moral order and civilization are disordered toward power, and not ordered toward virtue. One can not call that civilization at all. Rather it is what it has always been barbarianism.
tom said…
SF authors F Paul Wilson and L Neil Smith both make pretty reasonable attempts at constructing working anarchist societies with no such magical authority.

Economist David Friedman has written pretty extensively on the subject of anarchies in The Machinery of Freedom and many of his other books.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba