Skip to main content

The Greensboro News-Record steps up for Michael Munger

On today's editorial page:

By the numbers, Michael Munger has a lot of nerve asking for a microphone at gubernatorial debates.

Numbers of registered voters in North Carolina, that is.

Democrats: 2.6 million.

Republicans: 1.9 million.

Libertarians: 4.


But Munger, the Libertarian Party's candidate for governor, deserves a place with Democrat Beverly Perdue and Republican Pat McCrory anyway.

The Libertarian Party's roll of voters, all four of them, is comically low because North Carolina didn't recognize it until a few weeks ago. The party qualified by submitting petitions signed by more than 100,000 citizens and now is entitled to place candidates on the ballot in November. Before then, people who held Libertarian ideas couldn't register as Libertarians. Some were among the 1.2 million North Carolinians registered as unaffiliated.

As the candidate of the third recognized party, Munger ought to be invited to all gubernatorial debates. The decision is up to sponsors, but surely a third person on stage won't detract from a full and lively discussion of issues. More likely, Munger would add some interesting ideas.

He's no slouch when it comes to ideas. He holds a doctorate in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and chairs the Political Science Department at Duke. He's also taught at Dartmouth College, the University of Texas and UNC-Chapel Hill and was an economist for the Federal Trade Commission in the 1980s.

But Munger also knows he could set back his party if he makes a poor impression on voters.

"If I'm invited to the debates, and I do a bad job, voters are going to say 'I'm not interested,' " he told the News & Record's Mark Binker.

The point is that voters should have a chance to listen and decide. Sponsoring organizations should make room for Munger on stage because the state is better served when more points of view are considered. If Libertarians make sense, their numbers will grow.


You have to wonder, however, whether newspaper editors in the Tarheel State have always been so fair-minded, or whether it's just possible that raising a ruckus on behalf of your candidates instead of engaging in constant back-biting ("you're not Libertarian enough for me") might actually help make a difference.

Meanwhile, Michael, maybe we'll get you into one of those debates yet....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...