Skip to main content

You'll know that third party candidates are having an impact when....

.... Al Jazeera starts to cover them.

I'm serious, really. A huge chunk of the world relies on Al Jazeera for coverage of American and international news. Intriguingly, that coverage is usually pretty pedestrian, drawn from the same wire-service reports that small-town US newspapers use (although the editorials are something else).

There is a special page on the American presidential race, whereupon the coverage is usually pro-Obama, except when he's promising to keep Jerusalem for the Israelis at AIPAC. Not surprising.

Months ago, when it seemed that Hillary had a lock on the Democratic nomination and there were still 5 or 6 GOPers in the mix, Al Jazeera did give occasional coverage to Ron Paul, highlighting him as the only candidate actually talking about getting out of Iraq and pursuing a non-interventionist foreign policy.

But since Senator Obama became the presumptive Democrat nominee and Senator McCain secured the GOP nod, there has been no third part coverage at all.

No Ralph Nader. No Bob Barr. Not even an update on Ron Paul.

Why?

My guess is that from the Middle Eastern perspective the American presidential election is chiefly important for foreign policy reasons--getting out of Iraq, de-escalating confrontations with Iran, dealing with Kurds and Turkey or the Pakistani-Indian nuclear stand-off, not universal health care or tax code changes.

Now that there is a major party candidate--Barack Obama--calling for an essentially immediate pull-out from Iraq, he's taken all the air out of the room for third party candidates in terms of Third-World coverage.

Ralph Nader and Bob Barr are not going to be president; so there is going to be minimal interest in them and their now-subsumed calls for Iraqi withdrawal, unless....

It actually appears that third-party candidates are going to draw enough votes in key states to affect the outcome.

If, and only if, Bob Barr shifts the balance of power in Georgia or North Carolina--or Ralph Nader has a similar impact in Michigan or Florida--then we'll start to see international interest in the Libertarians, the Greens, the Constitution Party, etc.

I'll keep you posted. But since most major polling companies in the US are still refusing to include third-party candidates in their preference lists, don't hold your breath.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...