Skip to main content

The Kn@ppster hits a nerve: Apparently fervent Barr supporters have NO sense of humor

Several Bob Barr supporters are giving Tom Knapp a work-out over at The Kn@ppster, not just because he dropped his endorsement of the Barr/Root ticket, but because he posted this image:



And, of course, we wouldn't want to forget the boiler plate legalese:

The image of Bob Barr above is used pursuant to the Creative Commons License under which it was released by author Stephen P. Gordon on behalf of the Bob Barr Presidential Campaign. The other images (of, from left to right, Strom Thurmond, George Wallace and Lester Maddox) are in the public domain.


Doing a sort of six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon thing, it is Richard Viguerie who links Barr to George Wallace, with his 1976 attempt to take over the American Independent Party, which had been created originally as a vehicle for the segregationist Governor of Alabama. Wallace and Maddox, of course, were fellow massive resistance governors following Brown v Board of Education of Topeka KS, and spiritual descendants of Senator Strom Thurmond's Dixiecrats in the 1948 election.

Here's how Rock Howard's objection to Knapp's visual editorializing went:

As someone who grew up in the deepest nether regions of the Deep South, I find your posting to be tasteless and offensive. You are effectively attempting to label Barr as a racist by using a geographical stereotype. As a libertarian who happened to grow up in Dixie but hated the racial stigmatism that went on there, I have but two words for you: Bite me!

Oh one more thing. Your blog and all of your work are dead to me now. I will be actively spreading the word that people should not waste their time with your news digest and other claptrap. Needless to say I will not advertise there ever again nor donate to support what is apparently a bunch of hypocritical small tenters.


And--as usual, without equivocation--the Kn@ppster replied:

Actually, the "new Dixiecratism" uses homosexuals and immigrants, rather than blacks and "outside Communist agitators," as its bogeymen of choice.

Yes, I am "labeling" Barr as a Dixiecrat -- because I believe on the evidence of his own words and actions that that's what he is.

As far as the size of tents is concerned, I'm more than happy to share a tent with anyone who consistently calls for less, and less onerous, government.


Regular readers of this blog will know that I am a strong proponent of bare-knuckles, George-Carlin-type comedic and satiric ridicule, and that I can't stand people who think the lumps that their candidates excrete don't have an odor.

Give 'em hell, Tom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...