Skip to main content

"Radical And Immediate Action" Libertarian Style

I tire of the lefties who constantly whine that free marketeers "don't have any ideas about immediate action," simply because we point out the factual truth that 100 years of Obama-style "stimulus" has been, without exception, a failure that usually *extended* economic malaise.

You want quick action and radical solutions that would deliver real results in this economy? Fine. Here they are. All of them would remove the massive barrier to growth and investment that government has become, and would create real, lasting jobs pretty much immediately.

1) A five year payroll tax moratorium. This would create 1 million new small businesses and 7 million to 8 million new jobs within the first two years of the implementation of the plan.

2) A 15% across-the-board reduction in government spending in EVERY federal department. The federal government is rife with waste, as even the most outspoken lefties will concede. It surely would not be difficult to examine and extract 15% of the budget of each department while having little to no impact on its operations and functions.

3) Eliminate the capital gains tax on sales of stock, personal real estate, and commercial real estate on profits up to $1 million. Stock market crash? What stock market crash? 3 million new jobs created.

4) End TARP. Take the remaining funds and allocate them to the FDIC to cover deposits at the banks on the brink of failure. Liquidate the insolvent ones that are "zombies" and distribute their assets to efficiently-run banks that didn't make bad loans. Credit card companies, auto finance companies, and other subprime companies or irresponsible lenders should be allowed to collapse into bankruptcy or liquidation as any failed enterprise would. The sooner the losses "off balance sheet" get on balance sheet, accounted for, and dealt with in bankruptcy, the sooner confidence returns to the market. 1 million new jobs in financial services created.

5) Treat interest on any personal debt accumulated prior to Febrary 1, 2009 as tax deductable, so long as the debtor is paying down at least 1% of the principle per month. This will create incentives to repay existing debt, reducing defaults, while also encouraging savings and sound personal finances.

6) Require federal employees to pay a proportion of their health care and other benefits identical to the private sector average. Those who object should be invited to find jobs in the private sector with similar benefits. State governments receiving federal funds or bailout commitments should be required to implement a similar policy with state employees before receiving those funds -- state governments that do not comply should receive no further "assistance."

This economic plan could be passed in an omnibus bill, and would largely pay for itself in a balanced package of cuts to offset reductions in revenue. New jobs would create new tax revenues and further offset the costs. And the program would create 11 million to 12 million new jobs -- a feature that not even the most brazen of shills for the Bush-Obama "borrow-and-spend-and-borrow-and-spend-some-more" approach would argue their plan delivers.

Comments

Bowly said…
Meanwhile, Steve's "slippery slope" argument from earlier this week doesn't seem so fallacious now.

When do I get to call it socialism without being called a red baiter?
Thomas L. Knapp said…
"When do I get to call it socialism without being called a red baiter?"

When it starts being socialism instead of managerialism. Read your Burnham.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...