Skip to main content

Delawaredem back in at Delawareliberal-jason out?

Delawaredem, after quitting yesterday, now has a new post up at Delawareliberal.

There is no other comment on the blog regarding yesterday's firings, quittings, and general disagreement.

Meanwhile, in my comments section on the previous post, this monring I have received this anonymous comment from someone claiming to be jason [and it does sound like him, but I am waiting for confirmation]:

For the record, I am no longer with DelawareLiberal. Some team members and I had significant differences about the blog's direction and I decided that it was probably time for me to move on.

It is a great blog and they are great bloggers and great friends who will continue to have a real impact in Delaware for a long time.

Today there is even less legitimate "4th estate" media in Delaware than when I started commenting on blogs eight years ago. So blogs like this one and DelawareLiberal are more imporant than ever.



-Jason330


donviti's account still appears to be gone.

Pretending nothing happened is not going to be an effective strategy, guys.
Labels:

Comments

RSmitty Really Hates Thursdays When The DE Blogosphere Is Shredding Apart said…
WTF. If he did quit, I certainly hope it was his own doing and not a force-out. He owns the damn thing. Contrast to Burris who happily walked off totally on his own accord (as did I, but I didn't own it, like Burris did or Jason did/does).

Damn it, I knew my selfish act of leaving would cause them to unravel. They couldn't take the absence of my counter-balance. ;-)

Yeah, right!
August 20, 2009 at 9:19 AM
RSmitty Really Hates Thursdays When The DE Blogosphere Is Shredding Apart said…
Well, I attempted to comment on it and managed to get sucked up into spam. I can only wonder how their spam filter is currently set up to catch! Anywho, DDem responded that my comment will remain in spam until this evening, after a post on the subject is released.

I'll try to be open minded.

Of course, if this is all orchestrated, then I don't know if I'll enjoy it or be pissed for wating my time with it.
August 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Tyler Nixon said…
I dunno, I believe this about as much as I believed Jason's last seven resignations from blogging or that DelDem really believes my party affiliation has earned me a ciggy and blindfold or that these blogospheric personality melodramas amount to roughly a hoot in hell.

Jason - you're always welcome here, to the extent you can embrace liberty against the creeping utopian collectivism and partisan bomb-throwing of your former blog. Come to the light!
August 20, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Anonymous said…
TPN,

Thanks for putting out the welcome mat. How about we compromise and I only comment to endorse creepy utopian collectivism and parisian bon bon-throwing?

-Jason330
August 20, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Tyler Nixon said…
LOL, Jason!

But you can't seriously be leaving the scene.

I have no doubt Steve would be as glad as me to have you do guest opposing view posts anytime you like, and I mean that seriously.

We need to all get together at a Drinking Libertarianly and sort all this nonsense out.
August 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM
downwithabsolutes said…
I blame myself for starting this trend.

Seriously, though, I would be interested in reading a juicy tell-all describing the sordid behind-the-scenes goings-on at DL that precipitated this drama fest.

Jason, I'm sure your buddies here at DelLibertarian would enjoy a guest post on the topic!!!
August 20, 2009 at 6:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more