Skip to main content

Updating the blog roll

I'm terrible about routine clean-ups (just ask my wife).

So I have repeatedly put off cleaning up the blog roll here for a couple months. Part of the procrastination was my conscious reluctance to part with Down with Absolutes and The Girl in Short Shorts, both of whom have closed down.

Part of it was my own need to come to terms with the function of my blog roll, which is both to send readers to other places and make my own life easier.

I read Eric Dondero's Libertarian Republican every day, though Eric and I disagree on many fundamental issues. It is disingenuous to pretend I don't follow his blog by not listing it.

Thaddeus Pope's Medical Futility used to be up here, until reading it just got too depressing. But during health care debates it needs to be back.

Researching the post on Delaware Alexa rankings has convinced me I needed to be carrying Delmarva Dealings, that mike w.'s Another Gun Blog deserved a reciprocal post, and even though I seriously disagree with MJ Lower Slower Delaware has a place here; likewise--from the other end of the spectrum--Sussex County Angel.

George Phillies' Liberty for America is replacing the Boston Tea Party. I once had some hopes for the BTP as a national organization; now it is pretty much a moribund debating society that does little or nothing. I am actually far more close to George's philosophy, so I am hoping (this year, anyway), that LFA can gain some traction.

Delaware Online and Google News are now on, primarily for my own ease of daily navigation. Use them or not as it pleases you.
Labels:

Comments

Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD, HEC-C said…
I'll try to "accentuate the positive." Thanks.
August 12, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...
31 comments
Read more