Skip to main content

A footnote to the California same-sex marriage decision

Maybe you knew this, but I missed it until Becky pointed it out.

The dissent in the California same-sex marriage case was written by an out-of-the-closet lesbian judge, Carol Corrigan.

The author of the majority opinion, Chief Justice Ronald George, a Reagan appointee.

As Becky observes,

I think its great that the dissenting justice is a lesbian (and the Chief Justice ,who wrote the majority opinion, is a Republican, appointed by the Great Communicator himself).

What is so great about this is it illustrates how erroneous it is to label and pigeon hole people—and this is the way we have been in this divisive country for the past few years.

Not all Republicans are bigoted wingnuts.

And not all lesbians automatically subscribe to the “gay agenda” simply because of their sexual orientation.


Often we know this about people close enough to us locally that we can put faces to names, drink a beer with while watching our team lose a game, or bitch in the same line at the drug store.

Too often, however, we are willing to assume that people's online or on-air personas constitute the totality of their existence.

Comments

A similar "not what we expected moment" occurred when the Oregon Supreme Court overruled Multnomah County's decision to copycat San Francisco and issue marriage licenses. Justice Rives Kistler, who's gay, voted with the majority against the county's position. He has since been re-elected to a full term in a statewide race where his opponent tried to make his being a captive of gay rights interests an issue.

And just to put the last nail in that coffin, the voters have since elected Virginia Linder, a lesbian, the court as well- 2 of seven on the court. Kinda cool.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici