Skip to main content

Around the Horn Friday: Free Market Edition

The coolest thing about the blogosphere--Delaware and everywhere else--is that it truly does represent a free market in ideas.

Good stories survive, get noticed, get repeated, get attributed. . . .

Bad stories die.

While Delawareliberal remains, overall, staunchly pro-Obama, donviti has turned a more critical eye on the Illinois Senator (and even a less jaundiced one on the She-Clinton) with Let’s face it. He is still the lesser of the 2 other evils. dv has also put forth several really interesting questions about religion and public discourse, most recently I Agree with the Pope. The DL franchise is broadening, with posts from Cassandra m and Pandora, both welcome additions to the posting (as opposed to commenting) blogosphere.

Speaking of new entries, over at Down with Absolutes Dominique has stepped up while Mat's out running commo for Hartley-Nagle to keep some regular posting going on. She's already hosted two excellent (and well-attended) discussions on public education, here and here. (Although the first one may have shared enough youthful secrets about Mat to get his ass whipped at school.)

Meanwhile, at Delaware Curmudgeon, Shirley was more concerned with the arrival of spring than the upcoming primary: Girlgeek and Chainsaw are back on the road. However, Shirley still finds time for some food porn, commentary on a Ron Paul/Barney Frank alliance, and to protect my right to hang a pair of testicles from my rear-view mirror.

kavips takes a few seconds out from a series of lengthy posts on the windpower mess (here and here) in order to acknowledge the fact that here at DE Libertarian we occasionally publish short posts (Take that, Duffy!).

Speaking of Duffy, there are things he doesn't understand--a post that proves we must have gone to different schools together. He also has the first original thought on resolving the mortgage crisis/Bear Stearns bail-out that I've read anywhere.

Hube is consistently interested in questions of political correctness and intellectual freedom. This week at Colossus he's covered the idea that Elitism=Racism, the new UD residence life program, and Jimmy Carter's willingness to prostitute his own legacy by essentially beatifying Yassir Arafat in order to make inroad with Hamas(?). Unfortunately, Safari must be among the browsers that have trouble with Hube's site, so just go hit Colossus and browse around.

Delaware Politics has the Center-Right take on the last Clinton-Obama debate, the return of Frank Knotts, and a lengthy post by Dave to prove that he's still behind windpower. Meanwhile, David Anderson takes the opportunity of April 15 to ask for an apology for the US Tax Code.

Nancy Willing covers Senator Dave Sokola's proposal to dump the DSTP for a year to save public education bucks. But I have to admit that my favorite Delaware Way post this concerned the return of the Tush Artist (complete with illustrations).

As usual (and without peer despite kavips' close second) Tommywonk is still all over windpower, but his best post this week was an extended obituary for physicist John Archibald Wheeler, which should be must reading.

What I like best about The Digital Federalist is that Alan doesn't have to be long-winded to make a great point (unlike me, or Brian). His Can We Embrace Evil to Do Good? will make you think long after the fifteen seconds required to read it. Who knew there were libertarian aspects to Iranian society under the mullahs?

For the best coverage of the current funding crisis in Delaware Public Education, be sure to catch Jokers to the Right, Kilroy's Delaware, and Delaware Watch. At the latter, Dana also wants to know what idiot at the White House allowed the President and the Pope to be photographed at an angle in front of the Mississippi State Flag that makes them both look like neo-Confederates.

If you want to know what's been going on at Delaware Libertarian, then just scroll down after you finish reading this.

If I've missed anyone (Merit Bound Alley is on something of a hiatus), my apologies.

Three plugs for non-Delaware blogs you should be reading:

1) Waldo Lyddecker's Journal: food porn, slam-bang election coverage, and thoughtful posts on gay rights.

2) Third Party Watch: because Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, Cynthia McKinney, Mike Gravel, and Wayne Allyn Root are going to have a lot more to say about the results of this presidential election than the Demopublicans would like to think.

3) The Curvature: the best personal blog on the net for feminist issues; Cara--like Waldo--is one of the best writers out there.

Now the only question remaining is: who's up next week?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve, I was starting to think that my baby had died an ignominious death, but you have delivered a pitch=perfect ATHF (not to be confused with Aqua Teen Hunger Force). Thatnk you, you have restored my faith in the blogosphere.

Personally, I'd like to see what someone at Delawarepolitics does with Around the Horn. Giovanni?
Nancy Willing said…
Here, here for a Giovanni run!
Anonymous said…
Great post. You really put a lot of work into this. Thanks!

Cast my vote for Giovanni!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...