Skip to main content

How to go to jail for what the Judge and Jury said you didn't do . . .

From Vice Squad (via Drug War Rant):

Fortunately, this sort of thing could not happen in a country where juries provide the ultimate check on the power of the state to punish. The case just described, for instance, derives from some remote, tyrannous locale called "Wisconsin". The defendant was found guilty of possessing powdered cocaine -- a conviction that might have netted him three years in prison. He simultaneously was acquitted of a charge of possessing crack cocaine. The farsighted magistrate, the Solon of the Seventh Circuit, Judge John Shabazz, nevertheless sentenced the possessor of the unapproved substance(s) to 18 years in prison, relying on precedent that allows judges to alter sentences based on charges for which defendants are acquitted. The Supremes let the injustice stand.


So let's see if I've got this right. I'm accused of tax evasion and first-degree murder. I'm acquitted of the murder charge, but can still get the chair because I was charged with murder about the time I accelerated that depreciation on my business computer?

Oh, and in Australia the Race Discrimination Commissioner (h/t Thoughts on Freedom) want to move the burden of proof for racial discrimination charges to the accused. Ever try to prove a negative? I know Al Mascitti doesn't believe in slippery slopes, but that's the ultimate destination of the current it's the seriousness of the charge, not the nature of the evidence BS that crops up here in similar cases. . . .

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve,

I do not think there should be laws on racism except in cases of physical harm. I think it is something we should address socially through intermarriage and through force of the state only in extreme cases like the civil rights movement of MLK. But I do not like the civil rights act it is only a temporary law that must be renewed every ten years. The bill of rights should be the civil rights act of every single one of us. But until we socially break the back of racism I am not sure if that will be possible. I think the problem is xenophobia about the races, and it comes from the past but if we want to build a better future we have to fight with all kinds of issues about person laying their problems on the gorup rather than as an individual and the group laying their problems on each other and holding each other down, and we should value each citizen as a citizen not as a member of a race. Latino people often have many races in one family and this is a good model for the Americas, they still have race issues but typically not nearly as severe or serious as say dragging a noose behind a pick up truck or shooting a white kid for his 65 dollar shoes. In outstanding cases this only beomces a problem when we forget we are part fo one family and do not treat each other the same.
Anonymous said…
What I meant by that rambling post this morning, before coffee, is that Civil rights are human rights and should be protected by the Bill of rights for each and every one of us...

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?