Skip to main content

Mike Munger: Proving that Fund-raising CAN work for Libertarians

The Munger Money Grenade exploded for Dr Michael Munger, Libertarian gubernatorial candidate in North Carolina, on July 3-4, and when the dust settled 211 people had come through with $7,115!

That's an average contribution of $33.72, which is critical to understanding what can happen if we get out the support from Libertarians across the country for really good candidates.

Let's assume that each contributor reached a little deeper than they intended for a special event. (I did.)

So let's also assume that 200 people decided to adopt Michael Munger as their poster-professor Libertarian candidate, pledging $15/month over the next three months to carry Mike to the election.

That would be $3,000/month in steady income, $9,000 in all. Put that together with the money raised last week, and that would give Mike an guaranteed operating budget of $16,000 for the rest of the campaign--even if nobody else came through with a dime.

I know: even to Bob Barr or Ralph Nader, $16,000 is not enough to air-condition campaign headquarters or get you to a NASCAR event.

But for a Libertarian gubernatorial candidate who is already polling in the 5-6% range, $16,000 of dependable cash is the difference between anonymity and the chance to strike for higher numbers.

I don't know if any of you out there remember one of Mike's earliest campaign goals: to score at least 2% of the vote and guarantee continued ballot access for NC Libertarians.

Now, I'd suggest that an even more aggressive goal is in view: Let's help Mike Munger crack double digits in the NC general election.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...