Skip to main content

A Delaware Libertarian Exclusive: Interview with NC Libertarian Senatorial candidate Chris Cole


This is the platform statement of Libertarian US Senate candidate Chris Cole:

Unlike my opponents, I have never been for the war, until I was against it. I have always been against it. Democrats and Republicans always promise to "keep taxes low", while I understand that they are already outrageously high. I will never promise you gifts from other people's money, while silently taking your money to give to others. I will give you an opportunity to vote for the liberty we all cherish instead of voting against one evil or the another.


Cole is now scoring 4-6% in polling against the well-funded campaigns of Liddy Dole and Kay Hagan.

Recently, I had the opportunity to pose five questions to Cole, and these are his responses:

1. Libertarian candidates have been polling pretty well in NC this year. What one or two specific items from a Libertarian agenda do you think is resonating with voters strongly enough to make them > consider abandoning both the Republicans and Democrats?

Chris Cole: My suspicion is that they have caught on to the danger of voting for the lesser of two evils. In the past, someone was constantly telling me that he had to vote for A, because B would be so much worse. While I still get some of that, I think more people are recognizing that voting for the lesser evil has only gotten them evil. As Dr. Phil says, "So how's that working out for yuh?" And more people are seeing that they have been wasting their votes all along. Not so much that our message has suddenly turned attractive, but rather that voting the same way has only gotten them the same thing. Now they are open to considering something else. And in NC, the Libertarians are the only alternative.


2. The general wisdom is that Libertarian candidates hurt Republicans more than Democrats, yet your polling numbers consistently suggest you're actually drawing more Democratic support. Why do you think this is?

Chris Cole: Well, I'm openly gay, so the Democrats can't play the victim card with me. And since I have been talking about the same-sex marriage issue from that personal point of view, they can't use that "rightwing" canard they've been getting away with. Of course, the openness of most Libertarians to immigration helps with another Democrat faction, the Hispanics.


3. If elected as North Carolina's Senator, what would be your three primary legislative priorities?

Chris Cole: Ending the income tax, ending the war in Iraq, and promoting a non-punishment approach to illegal immigration (ending the prohibitions on low-end labor that create an economic demand for a black-market to fill that labor need).


4. Hawking some form of universal health care seems to be big this year for both Republicans and Democrats. What do Libertarians offer American voters who may not have health insurance?

Chris Cole: Ending the income tax will provide an instant pay increase, enabling everyone to better provide for their own healthcare. Also, state mandates make a huge difference in insurance premiums in different states. Similar policies cost triple in New Jersey what they do in Iowa, for example, yet individuals are forbidden to purchase coverage from outside their home states. I would use the interstate commerce authority to require states to permit residents to purchase policies from any state, greatly expanding access to insurance. On the state level, I would expect Libertarian statesmen to remove licensing and other restrictions on alternative healthcare, such as chiropractors, giving expanded access to much cheaper healthcare options.


5. Election to the Senate means dealing with foreign policy. Over the next six years, what is the biggest change that needs to occur in American foreign policy?

Chris Cole: In his book "A Foreign Policy of Freedom", Ron Paul gives repeated examples of how a coercive foreign policy has resulted in unintended consequences that were far worse than the situations we were trying to correct. I think that our future survival as a species, much less as a free society, depends on the adoption of a non-interventionist foreign policy. Not only is it necessary for global peace, but also for liberty here at home. The Founders got it right, such as when James Madison said, "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad."


Thanks, Chris.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?