Skip to main content

Reality is what my ideology says it is; or, clinging to their motorcycles and dropping their shirts


The first casualty--probably the main casualty--of this year's political season is . . . reality.

Senator John McCain appeared recently at the Sturgis [South Dakota] Rally 2008 to speak to an audience of possibly half a million bikers. It was obviously a good audience for McCain, although not a shoe-in. Bikers are notoriously individualistic, generally united by a visceral love of freedom than any shared formal ideology.

What interests me here, however, is not McCain himself, but how the event was portrayed by two different media outlets.

Politico.com saw it this way:

Every summer, nearly half a million motorcyclists descend on Sturgis, an otherwise sleepy town in South Dakota, for a nine-day celebration of all things Harley.

This year, the bikers, strippers and rockers were joined by a most unlikely guest: the presumptive Republican nominee for president, John McCain.

McCain's appearance before a veteran-heavy audience of several thousand bikers gathered at the Buffalo Chip Campground on Monday night was unlike any other campaign event to date — some sported signs like “Show UR [breasts] for McCain."

“Don’t let Nov. 4 find you on the open road,” McCain told the audience over the whir of engines and smell of diesel fumes. “I’m counting on you to show up.”

In theory, the Sturgis crowd should be an easy sell for McCain. Bikers, a fiercely patriotic and independent-minded group, could easily be expected to embrace McCain’s maverick image and military background.

Cliff Leach, a National Guard veteran, summarized the biker world view when he introduced McCain.

“We believe in a beautiful America. A land of beautiful roads, a land of beautiful bikes, ice-cold beers and a land of beautiful women,” he told the crowd. “And that’s the best hoo-ah a man can get.”


[There followed a detailed analysis of why McCain's message did not necessarily resonate with the bikers in attendance.]

On the other hand, this is how the Huffington Post covered the event:

The town of Sturgis, South Dakota will witness, on Monday, the rare fusion of drunken debauchery, public stripteasing, motorcycle rallying, a live performance by Kid Rock, and - last but not least - a veterans-themed speech by presidential candidate John McCain. Seriously.

On Sunday, the McCain campaign announced that the Senator will participate in the Sturgis Rally 2008 at Buffalo Chip in South Dakota, an annual tribute to American veterans. The event is up the Arizona Republican's wheelhouse, attracting thousands of active duty and former servicemen, many who have a natural affinity towards the Senator.

But it is hard not to notice the evocative, non-political sideshows that will literally surround McCain's speech. As the presumptive nominee takes the stage, the "Ringin' Wet & Wild" women's wrestling event will be taking place on the main amphitheater. Two hours before then, the "Miss Buffalo Chip Beauty Pageant - Bikinis on the Beach" will be staged at a different venue. That affair is described by ESPN's Jim Caple as "essentially a topless beauty pageant. And occasionally bottomless, too."

"During a drenching rain Wednesday night, the contest broke up into smaller groups and one woman wound up dancing naked on a bar top. Her boyfriend/husband saw her and angrily dragged her away as she struggled to put her pants back on and muttered something about how, "It's only this one week a year.""


How sweet. Sadly, the pageant also sees its share of domestic abuse, which even the event's organizers admit to Caple is a major problem.


[This article included no analysis whatsoever.]

The problem for the Huffington Post is that cultural diversity is a wonderful thing, unless it involves unrepentant carousing, topless beauty pageants, or (perish the thought!) a lot of folks who probably also brought firearms to the party in their saddle bags.

Somehow the message from our elite commentators seems to be that John McCain must be in serious trouble if he's been driven to slumming among these low-brow, reactionary [did I mention a lot of them were veterans], sexist bikers who [unfortunately] have as much right to vote as anybody whose idea of a great Christmas is a stocking full of Starbucks gift cards.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Ever tried doing an OPH booth at a biker event? I have, and it is going to give a VERY distinctive pattern on the Nolan chart...

Very high percentages of libertarian scores, fair numbers of centrists, and a lot of "lopsided" scores that are like 90/10 or so - mostly low on the economic side, I suspect because of poor gov't schooling... (I'd get more questions about the meaning of the economic freedom questions)

A gun show booth gives almost as libertarian a spread, but not quite...

The problem with getting the support of this naturally libertarian constituency is that the leadership of the motorcyclists rights community (which I was part of for many years) is very practical / cynical - the bikers have a political agenda on items ranging from helmet laws to global standards harmonization, and are only interested in working with politicians that can return the favor...

Until we can predictably start getting libertarians elected, we won't get much help from the bikers, but when we hit that tipping point they will be a valuable asset.

ART
Huffington Post forgot to mention the vibrator races. Now there's an example of Americana if I ever saw one !
aka rc said…
"and are only interested in working with politicians that can return the favor..."

Some of us are finding that most "bikers" (note quotation marks) are not interested in dealing with politicians at all.

And some are recognizing that not having the economic clout as say a telecommunications lobbyist, that engaging in the necessary evil on a "have to" basis is akin to "pissing in the wind". Something most bikers are not inclined to do, even with a windshield.

Many are finding that court challenges are more effective(Ex. Florida's Helmet law was actually declared unconstitutional prior to the legislature thinking it might be a good idea to "modify" it). But also long drawn out expensive affairs.

I myself have begun to wonder why I bothered to tune in, turn off and drop back in.

Unfortunately, not being able to afford sturgis I missed the opportunity to mingle w/ celebrities such as McCain, Kid Rock, Jay Leno and probably acquaintances of Ms. Huffington.

But then he ain't getting my vote anyway. The same with Obama and Ron Paul.

I'm writing in Shirley. She understand both Bikers and America.

Who Rah? rc
LOL, rc. Good thing you are in Florida. A write-in for me wouldn't be counted in Delaware.

I actually had a co-worker make a "Shirley for President 2010" sign with my employee ID picture. He thought of the campaign slogan himself:

"Enough is Enough !"

Hey, you never know. I ain't over the hill yet.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...