Skip to main content

The Texas GOP to Texas Libertarians (and Gandhi): "How Dare You!"

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Mohandas Gandhi *


Texas Republicans have a new solution for those pesky Libertarians: quit thinking you should have the right to organize a political party and go off to become the new ACLU. Or an anti-abortion group!? (Seriously.)

Here's the Travis Monitor:

It would be good if the Libertarians/libertarians attempted to aspire to real political effectiveness, because this country needs more freedom and less Government, and their influence could be salutory. But that would require taking off the big "L", abandoning a failed third party approach, and becoming libertarians working in the one major political party where their ideas are most at home: the Republican Party. Consider some of the most effective political activist organizations - the litigious ACLU, the social conservative Christian Coalition, the gay rights Human Rights Campaign. I would add another group from Texas: The Texas Alliance for Life. TAL has achieved multiple pro-life victories as a force that influences the two party system, working mostly with Republicans but also with prolife Democrats to achieve their goals. These groups successfully worked the two party system, rather than try to work outside it.


Yeah, that's a great idea, guys. We'll all go become good little robots and give up half our message--individual liberty from State coercion whether the State is liberal OR conservative--in order to insure GOP electoral success.

So here's the score: In Texas, they've stopped ignoring us. They've stopped laughing at us. Now they're starting to fight us. This is progress.

Unfortunately, at national Libertarian Party headquarters, the efforts of State and local candidates still seem to be stuck back on Ignore.




*Whose words, thankfully, have been dropped from the masthead of most increasingly rabid websites in Delaware.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks for completely and utterly missing the point. I point out that the ACLU and pro-life organizations are far more successful in achieving their goals than the LP because their STRATEGY is better.

As a pro-liberty conservative, it's not a matter of 'fighting you', it's more a matter of shaking my head at the LP's pinheaded inability to see the actual political consequences of what they do.

This was written in August 2008. I predicted spoilers and I was right.

This article CREDITED THE LP WITH A DEM VICTORY >..
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A699379

Not a SINGLE LP party candidate won in Texas, but liberal Democrats Diane Moldanoda and about 5 other LIBERAL DEMOCRATS won statehouse races.

Those state races meant more votes for higher taxes, nanny-statist anti-smoking bills, eco-extremism and other things libertarians abhor.

It would be fair to ignore a complaint about how the LP party is hurting the GOP as a party ... but that's not the point. The point is the LP is even hurting the cause of liberty.

United we (pro-liberty folks) stand, divided we fall.
Anonymous said…
"Not a SINGLE LP party candidate won in Texas, but liberal Democrats Diane Moldanoda and about 5 other LIBERAL DEMOCRATS won statehouse races."

To clarify - the LP acted as spoilers and in the process handed multiple races over to the Democrats.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?