Skip to main content

Brian Shields explains the intricacies of international wire-tapping

New blogs take time to develop a personality, so checking back periodically is a necessary exercise, as with Brian Shields' The Mourning Constitution, where he has the first original thought about wire-tapping I've seen yet.

Brian points out that the government claims it will only tap international calls.

Then he reminds you of the last time you dialed an 800-number for customer service and ended up speaking to Vhopal, India.

After that:

Say you have a situation with John Druglord is in Arizona making a phone call to Joe Drugdealer in Sacremento. They plan on coordinating a distribution of a large number of goods. The feds want to catch these two and make a big drug bust.

Now, if they wanted to, the feds could tell the telecom company to reroute all of John Druglord's phone calls to a server overseas, and re route them back into the US on it's way to Joe Drugdealer's phone. It would take literally milliseconds. On the way back into the country, the feds would have the legal ability to tap the phone conversation between two US citizens that are within the country.


Of course, John Druglord could also be Sally Greenpeace, Bill the John Bircher, or somebody running a 527 who is critical of Barack Obama.

Good thinking, Brian. Now you've depressed me for the rest of the day.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It is also a little known secret that it is even questionable how secure ANY phone call made in the US really is...

I used to work in the telecom business - the following is somewhat simplified, but...

There are two parts to a phone call, the actual connection between the two parties that are talking (what you hear) and the "Out of band" part which is the digital signalling network that (among many other things) tracks billing and "builds" the connection route between the caller and callee.

This out of band network is built with equipment from, and is largely controlled by, a couple of Israeli companies...

Back in the "bad old days" tapping a phone call required making a connection to your line either by climbing a pole somewhere, or connecting down at the local Telco Central Office. With the Out-of-band system, all that is needed is to enter your phone number into the right computer, and your call can be routed as Brian describes, and more importantly, routed to as many additional locations as desired...

Now keep in mind that except for a few highly specialized Gov't / Military networks, ALL phone calls are processed via this network. When a tap order is given, it is handed to the phone co, which essentially sends it to Tel Aviv for processing...

I know of no real protection on the system other than end-user encryption to prevent ANY phone number from being monitored this way, by some other gov't if not ours...

Some of the "911 Truthers" have attempted to include this in their arguments that Israel may have known more than they are admitting to, but I make no comment on it, beyond saying that it's possible.

ART (Who used to work for a different department of one of the companies mentioned...)
Brian Shields said…
Sorry about the depression. If it makes you feel any better, I am uncomfortable having what may be called a passing paranoid delusion become verified as indeed possible.

This type of post is what, hopefully, will be the real direction I bring my blog. Well, not the paranoid depression part, those may be just the side effects.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...