Skip to main content

The Libertarian National Committee continues to make the case for its own obsolescence

So Ron Paul convened a press event to showcase third party candidates, including the Constitution Party's Chuck Baldwin, the Green Party's Cynthia McKinney, Independent Ralph Nader, and the Libertarian Party's Bob Barr....

Only Bob Barr decided not to show up, leading to the usual feeding frenzy among Libertarians of all persuasions, which earned the name snubgate among the blogs critical of the Barr/Root ticket. The most passionate among them began circulating a petition for Barr to be removed from the Libertarian ticket, and demanding that at least one LNC member stand up and offer a motion to remove Barr from the ticket....

For the high crime of insulting Ron Paul??

Then there were the competing motions at the LNC--that proposed by Aaron Starr which criticized Paul for not endorsing Barr and another to be offered by either Mary Ruwart or Rachel Hawkbridge to apologize to Dr No.

You can follow the unfolding drama at either Last Free Voice or Independent Political Report.

But, frankly folks, the details are not what interest me.

What interests me is the continuing case for the irrelevancy of the Libertarian National Committee, and the strange fascination of my Libertarian sisters and brothers for engaging in passionate, meaningless fights that do nothing to advance the cause of limited government or individual liberty.

Instead, they invest the dinosaur with relevance it does not deserve.

My friend Chris Cole, the Libertarian candidate for Senate in North Carolina, thinks I go too far when I want to eliminate the LNC and rebuild the Libertarian movement from a decentralized emergent base:

I think this overstates the case. A presidential candidate is essential for three reasons. From least to most important: first, it guarantees that every person (at least in most states) will have a chance to see and vote for a Libertarian candidate, even when there are no local candidates; second, it supports the credibility of the entire LP ticket, verifying that the local guy isn't just a lone ranger; and third, and most importantly, in many states, the presidential candidate counts for ballot status (here in NC, ONLY the votes for president or governor count toward ballot status). Local candidates are the face of the party, and can best reach their neighbors, but that is why the laws remove those votes from consideration for ballot status. Where I do agree is on the emphasis of resources. Just as the top of the ticket validates the rest of the candidates, the down-ticket candidates direct voters up the line. We ignore them at our peril.


George Donnelly also makes an important point:

To cede the presidential elections is a big step. There is a lot of power there that can be used to advance the liberty agenda. And more votes for president can mean savings on future ballot access.


OK, two legitimate points here: ballot access and the appearance of an up-ticket.

Take the second one first. Granting that it's in general nice to have a presidential candidate running for exposure, I would counter that one of the great failures of the Libertarian Party is not to emphasize off-year elections and use them as building blocks for long-term success. The great opportunity offered by off-year elections is that overall voter turn-out among the Demopublicans tends to be depressed, therefore leaving an energized Libertarian base as a larger overall percentage of the vote. Moreover, I'd argue that people who have never considered voting third-party are much more likely to experiment in their choices.

As for ballot access, that's problematic no matter what form of organization the Libertarian movement takes. The system is clearly and intentionally rigged.

But here's a thought to chew on: Ralph Nader is currently leading the LNC in terms of states on the ballot, and he's doing so with a jury-rigged independent movement that--while it apparently enjoys more cash than the LNC--should be operating at a distinct disadvantage against the better-organized LP.

Except that it isn't.

Perhaps that has something to do (just maybe) with the fact that the LNC wastes its time trying to expel Angela Keaton or debating whether or not Ron Paul has been insulted or has insulted the LP.

Ya know, organizations with a purpose tend to act like they have one.

Organizations that have outlived their purpose tend to spend a lot of time chasing their tails.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You've hit the nail on the head, Steve. I've disaffiliated with the LNC because it's an ineffective wanna-be Student Council at a cliquish high school.

I mean, how damning can you get? At a time when the federal government has socialized most of the credit system, provided massive bailouts to two major investment banks and a massive insurance company, and is prepping for a multi-hundred-billion-dollar bailout of failing banks and thrifts, the "Libertarian" National Committee focuses on three more important initiatives:

1) Booting out their most popular at-large member in a bullshit pogrom;

2) Grovelling to a 20-year federal employee who is a notorious racist and homophobe;

3) Launching a grudge lawsuit to kick a guy off the ballot in NH who has done more legwork and financial work for ballot access in New England than anybody else.

Clearly the LNC has outlasted its usefulness. The degree of work required to "recapture" it is better applied directly promoting the cause of liberty. If the LNC doesn't come to its senses and get oriented towards real causes, it will go out of business.

The massive plunge in donations already show that it's well on its way to extinction.

Angela's work for AntiWar.com is much more important to the liberty movement at this point in time than her LNC seat -- the LNC has wiped her out with bullshit.

If I was in her place, I'd have walked out with a dismissive laugh weeks ago. I admire her strength and tenacity, but I'm not sure it's going to be enough to make the rest of the dead weight on the LNC suddenly relevant.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba