Skip to main content

Something stinks in Texas: and it smells like Democrats and Republicans

The filing deadline to certify a Presidential candidate on the November ballot in Texas was August 25, 2008.

The Democratic Party, according to the copies obtained under a FOIA request by the Bob Barr campaign, sent in its filing materials on August 27, following an email on August 26.

The Republican Party sent in a letter dated August 26, and a second letter on August 29 claiming in essence that their original letter had been sent in before the August 25 deadline:

This filing is meant to amend our previous filing under this section which was timely filed on August 25, 2008. In the event you or a court of competent jurisdiction deem this amendment to be untimely, I intend that the previous filing be effective.


The problem, of course, is that there was no August 25 filing. Or was there?

There are two copies of the same August 26 filing referenced above in the Texas Secretary of State's files. Both bear handwritten annotations.

On August 26 filing (1), the note says:

Received 8/25/08
Replacement from original filed


On August 26 filing (2), the note says:

Old
Melinda
8/[the date here is a 26 with a 5 written in over the 6]/08
replaced today


You really should go examine the PDF images of these documents.

The upshot is that there is no question that the Democratic Party missed the filing date, and no document for the GOP in the files with any date older than August 26, despite later protestations and hand-written annotations that their letter was actually received the day before it was written.

The GOP is obviously quite aware, given the snippet posted above, that their filing could be contested in court; I suspect the DNC doesn't care that much, as Barack Obama is not likely to win Texas anyway. If both parties got thrown off the ballot, as Pandora noted here about a week ago, it would dramatically advantage Obama (because John McCain could not even run as a write-in candidate; that deadline is also August 25.)

Will Obama and McCain appear on the ballot in Texas in November?

You can bet the mortgage payment on it, the law and their failure to follow it notwithstanding.

But it sure makes the point about the double standard of ballot access in this country: two parties get on the ballot regardless of the law, and then use every technicality of law to keep anybody else off.

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
So on November 7th, when the retread of the 2000 election begins I'm going to blame you when they start filing motions in Texas.

How on Earth either party couldn't manage to file on time in the state with the second largest number of electoral votes is beyond me.
Anonymous said…
Pretty sad that they can't manage to file on time, but one of them will run the country...

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba