Skip to main content

We'll give you a 2% discount on that $23,000 bill if we get a check within ten days....

The US Government has become the nation's largest mortgage lender and the nation's largest insurance company.

This, as my blogging colleagues at Delawareliberal point out, is the process of privatizing gain and socializing loss.

My friend Brian Miller has toted up the cost of just the last week's bailouts of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG:

By my calculation, the government has added $3 trillion to the national debt in the nationalization/bailouts of Fannie, Freddie, Bear, and AIG just in the last 10 days. That's about $23,000 for every tax return in the United States....


$23,000. $23,000. $23,000.

I can't get my mind around that. In the course of two weeks my government has just sucked the cost of a new car, or a year's college tuition for one of my children, or .... Well, you can fill in the blanks.

$23,000. If the government taking over these giants is such sound policy, how come the markets keep tumbling?

$23,000. And I'm supposed to trust Senator Barack Obama, who has been the second largest recipient of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae political contributions in the last ten years, to clean up this mess? Yep. Right.

$23,000. Who said they were too large to fail? And why?

$23,000.

$23,000.

When are American voters going to wake up to the fact that all we have done here is to transfer liability from those who took unreasonable risks to those who didn't?

Answer: apparently never.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...