Skip to main content

Apparently torture is now OK with liberals....

From WSJ:

WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama is unlikely to radically overhaul controversial Bush administration intelligence policies, advisers say, an approach that is almost certain to create tension within the Democratic Party.

Civil-liberties groups were among those outraged that the White House sanctioned the use of harsh intelligence techniques -- which some consider torture -- by the Central Intelligence Agency, and expanded domestic spy powers. These groups are demanding quick action to reverse these policies.

Mr. Obama is being advised largely by a group of intelligence professionals, including some who have supported Republicans, and centrist former officials in the Clinton administration. They say he is likely to fill key intelligence posts with pragmatists....

On the campaign trail, Mr. Obama criticized many of President George W. Bush's counterterrorism policies. He condemned Mr. Bush for promoting "excessive secrecy, indefinite detention, warrantless wiretapping and 'enhanced interrogation techniques' like simulated drowning that qualify as torture through any careful measure of the law or appeal to human decency."...

As a candidate, Mr. Obama said the CIA's interrogation program should adhere to the same rules that apply to the military, which would prohibit the use of techniques such as waterboarding. He has also said the program should be investigated....

The new president could take a similar approach to revising the rules for CIA interrogations, said one current government official familiar with the transition. Upon review, Mr. Obama may decide he wants to keep the road open in certain cases for the CIA to use techniques not approved by the military, but with much greater oversight.

The intelligence-transition team is led by former National Counterterrorism Center chief John Brennan and former CIA intelligence-analysis director Jami Miscik, say officials close to the matter. Mr. Brennan is viewed as a potential candidate for a top intelligence post. Ms. Miscik left amid a slew of departures from the CIA under then-Director Porter Goss.

Advisers caution that few decisions will be made until the team gets a better picture of how the Bush administration actually goes about gathering intelligence, including covert programs, and there could be a greater shift after a full review.


What, uh, are campaign promises worth, anyway?

Oh, yeah. I remember now.

Comments

A story that can at best be called thinly sourced, from a paper with a clear partisan agenda (not that of the present administration), describing actions not yet taken by an administration not yet in office? Then dump the alleged views of what the story says is a handful of intelligence pros- none of whom are identified as liberals- and tie in everyone in America who might be called "liberal" as approving of torture? I give that essay very low marks indeed. But then, I'm just a liberal. I don't know any better.
A story that can at best be called thinly sourced, from a paper with a clear partisan agenda (not that of the incoming administration), describing actions not yet taken by an administration not yet in office? Then dump the alleged views of what the story says is a handful of intelligence pros- none of whom are identified as liberals- and tie in everyone in America who might be called "liberal" as approving of torture? I give that essay very low marks indeed. But then, I'm just a liberal. I don't know any better.
In please of "present administration" kindly substitute "incoming administration."
The Last Ephor said…
Which means Conservatives will become outraged by abuses at Gitmo sometime around 1/21/09
Ugh. I may have to regretfully agree with my liberal friend Waldo here.

Just as his campaign was vacuous and without substance, so are the innuendoes and conjuecture afterwards.

He hasn't done anything yet (well, he hasn't done anything EVAH), so we'll have to wait until Obama is fully vetted.

Unfortunately for us, that won't actually take place until he takes office.
Anonymous said…
There is only one president at a time. Obama will close GITMO just as McCain said he would. George
W. Bush will try to pardon himself and all the torturers and other traitors to the Consitution.

I don't recall any of you rejecting torture...despite the Geneva Conventions.

Take a chill pill, Obama will do it when he becomes PRESIDENT. Why didnt the idiot son do it...oh I forgot...he doesnt believe in constitional law...the imperial resident.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba