Skip to main content

Hunters are crazed, drunken, irresponsible maniacs--just ask the News Journal

With the onset of hunting season, I suppose it was time for the obligatory anti-hunting story. This year's version entailed a sympathetic look at the Delaware's Fish & Wildfire enforcement officers--who are, by the way, great guys who do a great job.

The article is something else entirely. Here are all the references to hunters in the article:

Case One: drunken bums with cell phones

A group of deer hunters from Maryland was waving weapons and harassing juveniles who were riding motorcycles around the Sandtown Landfill....

"I will warn you guys about drinking. I can smell it from here," Aydelotte said as he performed a check of their weapons.

It turned out the men could not have arrived all that recently: A third hunter, the 16-year-old son of one of the men, already was deep in the woods, and was summoned by phone to return.

The boy was likely sent into the brush to steer deer toward the others, who could then simply hop out of the truck and shoot, Aydelotte said. It's a hunting method that's as old as mankind, but aided today by cell phones.

One of the men had no hunting license, but because Aydelotte didn't actually see him hunting there was no violation.

"Five minutes later, he'd have been in the woods, and drinking," he said.


Case Two: The drug-abusing hunter

"This is one of the most dangerous times of the year for our officers," said Rhodes, who pointed out that "approaching armed strangers in the woods" is a job description unique to wildlife agents.

Those strangers are sometimes under the influence of alcohol, Aydelotte said....

Rhodes remembered an incident a few years ago when an enforcement officer came upon a man deep in the woods who was huffing paint fumes from a paper bag.

A scuffle ensued, and it took several agents to subdue the man, because "he did try to go for one of the officers' guns. It was that incident that led to field officers carrying Tasers today, he said.


Case Three: The moron with a crossbow

Being independent and working different shifts are the things Aydelotte loves about his job. A few years ago, he made an arrest at 3 a.m.

It was the night after Halloween, and he had set up a decoy deer in a farmer's field near Harrington, where illegal hunters using spotlights had been reported.

"We're waiting there in the dark, and we see a truck pull up, and see a light. Then the decoy's head falls off, but we never heard a shot fired," he said.

The driver of the truck had shot the decoy with a crossbow, firing out the passenger window, past his 12-year-old son.


That's it. No mention of the fact that accidents are actually rare in Delaware, fatalities really so [so much so that the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife didn't include any statistics in its 2007 report], or that over 35,000 people have completed the Delaware Safe Hunter program in the past three decades.

No mention of the fact that thousands of Delaware citizens hunt responsibly each year, and donate thousands of pounds of meat to charity.

No mention of the dozens of people arrested each year for harassing hunters when they are engaged in a perfectly legal sport and doing so in a safe manner.

That's what I call truly objective journalism, of the kind you can find practiced here--where at least they are honest about their objective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...