Skip to main content

A note for Pandora

A few days ago you posted a very personal and very thoughtful piece on the Difference Between Health Care and Health Insurance. It was an excellent, and thought-provoking piece on what's wrong with the current system.

For me it was a problem in that I either had to skip replying or write something far too lengthy to go into the comments section.

So I didn't reply. But I have been working on a fairly lengthy response that I think might surprise you. Real life being what it is, however, this one is requiring some research and may take at least another week to show up.

Just didn't want you to think I missed it.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks, Steve. I can't wait to read your post.

After I wrote that post I thought of another personal incident...

We had planned on a normal delivery when my son was born. Unfortunately, the baby went into fetal distress and my blood pressure crashed. As I was rushed into surgery - uncertain what was going to happen to me or my baby - I kept telling my husband to call our insurance company.

You see, in order to have a C-section (scheduled or emergency) covered we had to notify the insurance company within 24 hours of the procedure. What a disgrace. I'm sure this helped my blood pressure. God, I was nuts... and young... and broke.
November 19, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Steve-So glad you are preparing a piece. I too saw the entry, and all I had time to do was harrumph. It was provocative, but not excellent; and I do fear those who think even the best European models will work are woefully misinformed. What people forget is Americans are demanding consumers. They will be the first to scream when placed in a ward of 4-8 other patients, and the bathroom is down the hall. Then the nut says well, we can have them pay extra if they want a private room or upgrade. Give that 2 years, then we have people screaming we discriminate against the poor, and everyone deserves a private room! And on and on from there. Americans need to be informed what is really necessary; and I don't think our spoiled egocentric way of life can fit into any model of universal healthcare. They will demand annual mammograms, and prostate screenings for people well up in age; when other countries wouldn't even bother. Our adolescent population would have to forego the Holy Grail of acne medication, Accutane, at a consumer cost of 1300 bucks per round, until our demanding public had insurance cover it as a regular prescription. No, America is ready for whatever universal or socialized, or inclusive, or single payor, healthcare for everyone else, except their situation. What I would encourage is coverage for universally accepted pro-active public policy initiatives. We should not be paying for childhood immunizations, birth control alternatives, and a select few other things. But I really don't want to be picking up the tab for cancer care, heart disease etc. We will all die from something, and sometimes you just have to go with it. Now, that's why we have insurance. But Americans just don't get it; and want every skintag removed. Good luck with your research. I'm keeping my US healthplan, and don't mind that deductible, for what I have gotten in return over the years-in good health and bad.
November 19, 2008 at 7:29 PM
Anonymous said…
Anxiously awaiting the healthcare piece.
November 23, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...
26 comments
Read more