Skip to main content

The Great Bob Barr fizzle

For all the proud talk of breaking 1%, of breaking 1 million votes, Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr justified his critics by pulling in (according to the tally available at this moment) just 477,000 votes.

By comparison:

Michael Badnarik 397,000 in 2004
Harry Browne 384,000 in 2000
Harry Browne 486,000 in 1996

Or, looked at another way, here's what other Libertarian candidates achieved last night:

Chris Cole (Senate, NC) 131,000 votes
Michael Munger (Governor NC) 121,000 votes
Allen Buckley (Senator GA) 121,000 votes
Yvonne Schick (Senator TX) 184,00 votes
The total for four Libertarian State candidates: 557,000 votes

There are a lot of ways to slice and dice this, but the simplest is to acknowledge some stark realities:

Bob Barr is not a Libertarian, and he got rejected by the majority of Libertarian voters.

The strength of the Libertarian movement is in its usually ignored State affiliates.

The strategy for electing freedom-oriented candidates needs to be rethought.

Oh, and--perhaps not surprisingly--(faux) Libertarian Republican has taken a lower road than even I could possibly have imagined:

Comments

Eric Dondero said…
Explain to me please how this is the "low road."

The guy is an outright Nazi. Do you not believe that he has ties to Terrorist Bill Ayers? Were Rev. Wright's comments "Goddam America" made up? Is Rashid Khalidi not Obama's friend? Do you doubt Obama's close ties to racial Anti-Semite Farakhan?

Hussein has a perfect 100 liberal/fascist voting record from the Marxist ADA.

He was endorsed by the Communist Party USA.

He had Black Panthers with batons in Philadelphia yesterday blocking polling places.

And you have the audacity to even doubt his Naziism.

You have no right to call yourself a "libertarian." You are an enemy of liberty.

Kindly cease and desist from using the libertarian label.

Immediately.
To equate Senator Obama with a genocidal, mass murderer who started a World War, and to equate tens of millions of Americans with different political beliefs with Nazi brownshirts suggests that (a) you don't have a clue what German National Socialism was all about [hint: by this point in his career Adolf Hitler had already been jailed once for an attempted coup, and his party had wracked up multiple political murders]; and that (b) you don't understand the difference between liberalism, fascism, and naziism.

Neither comes as any surprise. Having been proven dramatically wrong in believing Bob Barr would pick up over 1 million votes, your tactic now is to conflate a liberal American politician with a genocidal maniac in order to district people from the reality that the "Republican" part of your so-called Libertarianism doesn't have a clue.

Last point: nobody declared you [thankfully] the guardian of the title Libertarian; I'm inordinately pleased to be considered an "enemy of liberty" by a man with such little regard for truth or history.

Have a nice day, Eric.
Eric Dondero said…
And which tells me you don't have a clue what liberty means.

Yet you persist in calling yourself a "libertarian." That's a travesty. You should be ashamed.
Eric Dondero said…
I posted this article at LR Blog with you in mind Mr. Newton:

http://libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com/2008/11/and-for-those-who-doubt-that-obama-and.html
Unknown said…
FYI: Munger and Cole are in the same state. You double dipped on your total vote number.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...