Skip to main content

Ron Paul Comments on the Future

The questions now being asked are: Where to go from here and who's to blame for the downfall of the Republican Party?

Now, in light of the election, many are asking: What is the future of the Republican Party?

But that is the wrong question. The proper question should be: Where is our country heading? There's no doubt that a large majority of Americans believe we're on the wrong track. That's why the candidate demanding "change" won the election. It mattered not that the change offered was no change at all, only a change in the engineer of a runaway train.

Once it's figured out what is fundamentally wrong with our political and economic system, solutions can be offered. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the policy changes needed, then the party can be rebuilt.

------------------------------

The Republican Congress never once stood up against the Bush/Rove machine that demanded support for unconstitutional wars, attacks on civil liberties here at home, and an economic policy based on more spending, more debt, and more inflation -- while constantly preaching the flawed doctrine that deficits don't matter as long as taxes aren't raised.

------------------------------

Party leaders concentrated only on political tricks in order to maintain power and neglected the limited-government principles on which they were elected. The only solution for this is for Republicans to once again reassess their core beliefs and show how the country (not the party) can be put back on the right track. The problem, though, is regaining credibility.

After eight years of perpetual (and unnecessary and unconstitutional) war, persistent and expanded attacks on our privacy, runaway deficits, and now nationalization of the financial system, Republicans are going to have a tough time regaining the confidence of the American people. But that's what must be done.

------------------------------

Since the new alignment of political power offers no real change, we will remain on the same track without even a pretense of slowing the growth of government. With the new administration we can expect things to go from bad to worse.

------------------------------

Opportunity abounds for anyone who can present the case for common sense in fiscal affairs, for protection of civil liberties here at home, and avoiding the senseless foreign entanglements which have bogged us down for decades and contributed so significantly to our fiscal and budgetary crisis.

------------------------------

Why should one be excluded from the Republican Party for believing and always voting for:

• Limited government power

• A balanced budget

• Personal liberty

• Strict adherence to the Constitution

• Sound money

• Strong defense, avoiding all undeclared wars

• No nation-building and no policing the world

------------------------------

The problems are easily understood and the answers are not that difficult. Abusing the rule of law and ignoring the Constitution can be reversed. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the needed reforms, it can lead the way and regain its credibility. If power is sought for power's sake alone, the Party will never be able to wrench away the power of the opposition.

------------------------------

To ignore the political struggle and only "hope for the best" is pure folly. The march toward a dictatorial powerful state is now in double time.

All those who care -- and especially those who understand the stakes involved -- have an ominous responsibility to energetically get involved in the battle of survival for a free and prosperous America.

Comments

Yup, good on the broad overview, pretty lame on the details. Still hewing to the view that personal liberty is maximized by white straight men.
Tyler Nixon said…
Righto, because race and sexual orientation are the first determiners of the validity of one's ideas or ideology. No?
The Last Ephor said…
• No nation-building and no policing the world

While I agree the piracy issue is a serious one. Who keeps the sea lanes open if not the USN? Private security companies?
Tyler Nixon said…
Interesting point, Duff. Do you mean piracy is NOT a serious issue? I think the word "serious" is a good operative term for whether we need to be intervening anywhere with our national resources.

While you raise an interesting topic I am thinking Paul's aim is more about land-based "policing", such as turning the U.S. into an arm of the U.N., insinuating our power and resources into situations of no serious or even real consequence to U.S. national defense.
Anonymous said…
So was Thomas Jefferson's violation of Libyan sovereignty therefore unconstitutional? For those of you who are products of Delaware public education, Jefferson sent the US Marines to attack the Barbary Pirates, who were preying on shipping in international waters - that's why the Marine Hymn includes the line, "...to the shores of Tripoli."
Anonymous said…
I cannot take Ron Paul seriously.

I didn't believe his bullshit non-apologies on his racist newsletters.

And his dodging the issue on the don't ask don't tell front didn't help him.

His endorsement of DOMA didn't help.

His efforts to legislatively restore state sodomy laws, declaring that states "have the right to regulate sexual conduct based on local standards," turned me completely off.

His endorsement of Pastor Chuckie was a slap in the face to the "movement" he supposedly represents.

And his endorsement of Proposition 8 in California is just the latest outrage.

Seriously, if people want to heal the rift in the Libertarian movement, they need to move beyond this crazy-assed conservative 20-year federal employee and the unjustified deification of him.

He has achieved nothing notable in a policy perspective, has refused to work across party lines on issues where he agrees with others (i.e. opposing the bank bailout with Dennis Kucinich), and ranks as one of Texas's biggest pork barrel congressmen.

Get out the brain bleach and use it, Ron Paul supporters.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?