Skip to main content

Andy Horning: Libertarian candidate for Indiana US Senate

Andy Horning: Libertarian
for US Senate Indiana
In 2008 Andy Horning's Indiana gubernatorial campaign garnered over 57,000 votes (2.1%), which was--as near as I can calculate it--probably the 7th highest vote total for any Libertarian running for statewide office that year.

That's a working start.  Today Andy is running for US Senate in Indiana, and he aspires to do considerably better.

Here are a few quotes from his new (and still partly under construction) website:
We should have laws that are few enough to know, simple enough to understand . . .
and important enough that every one of them is to be obeyed equally, by everybody without exception, all the time.
The Republicans are supposed to be protecting our wallets, the Democrats are supposed to be protecting our rights, but none of them are doing that any more . . .
they're protecting themselves.
Andy is an individual who has thought out his views very carefully.  Even when you don't agree with him, he will make you think.  For example, Andy sees himself as both a Christian and a Libertarian, and doesn't see any conflict there.  He thus reasons very carefully on issues like same-sex marriage:


What we call gay marriage is not (I repeat, NOT) about a church recognized covenant between a man, a woman, and God.  No, the church gave that unto Caesar a long time ago.  That’s why the minister says, “…by the power vested in me by the State of…”
Marriage, my fellow Americans, is politics.
Now, marriage is about Social Security, bereavement pay, visitation rights, property rights, work rules, tax rules, and more rules, rules rules from the Great Caesar’s Golden Calf.  Marriage is legal, contractual, corporate, political privilege, rights, guardianship and healthcare.
So, those who now want to claim the moral high ground on traditional marriage have wallowed into the preposterous role of promoting disparity in matters of simple justice.
I propose we get politics entirely out of marriage.  From the Christian perspective, we should take from Caesar what is God’s. From the secular perspective, we should make policy and law that does not involve sorting, allocating and denying rights based upon abstract and arbitrary political categories. 
Same endgame: get government out of the marriage business.  Same middle game--if secular marriage is going to confer rights, then it must confer them to everyone.  Different path to get there:  I'm OK with that.

Sometimes Andy is, perhaps, too honest for the voters, but he brings up questions that need to be discussed:

To me, the cornerstone and hallmark of a working civil society is peace.
And I must say something that will be very unpopular to some (who’d not likely vote for me anyway):
I do not “thank a soldier” for my freedoms.
Our freedoms were won by citizen soldiers fighting the professional standing armies of that age’s global superpower.
Think about it. Who ever takes away liberty but the professional armed forces/police of the political elites?
Let us stop fooling ourselves about the nature of armed forces. They do what they’re told to do. We’ve been very lucky, so far, that they’ve not been told to do what is historically typical, and seen around the world still today.
Having spent 21 years in the US military I would like to believe Andy's wrong, that American soldiers would not obey illegal orders with regard to the occupation of their own country.  But having also met the officers who plan for that very eventuality, and have witnessed on multiple occasions that which is characterized as "civil disorder training," I am not at all sure he is wrong.  We have traded in, somewhere along the way during the Cold War, for a standing army and all it implies.

Andy Horning is a strong Libertarian voice, and I endorse his candidacy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?