Skip to main content

El Somnabulo at Delaware Liberal: Veterans are not "worthy of all these special bennies at state expense"

Today's wrap-up of Delaware General Assembly action at Delaware Liberal, penned by El Somnabulo, takes the opportunity to editorialize against State-sponsored benefits for US military veterans:
Yet another bill designed to help veterans (I’m sorry, but yet another protected class, as far as I’m concerned) will likely pass unanimously today. HB 275(Jaques) creates the Veterans Opportunity Credit, which provides yet another tax credit for businesses who hire veterans. Sure would be nice to see a similar bill for those who lost their jobs during the recent economic downturn.
--snip--
[The Veterans Affairs] committee was formed and basically told to ‘go crazy’ when it comes to devising bills that give special benefits to veterans. Hey, we’ve got an all-volunteer military now. Veterans chose that profession. I respect veterans, I respect them a lot. But I don’t think they are worthy of all these special bennies at state expense and at the expense of other citizens who find themselves in the same straits as do veterans. Oh, did I mention there’s an election in a few months?
The "I respect veterans, I respect them a lot" throwaway line is utterly ridiculous when followed by "I don't think they are worthy of all these special bennies at state expense and at the expense of other citizens who find themselves in the same straits as do veterans" because "We've got an all-volunteer military now.  Veterans chose that profession."

You're an idiot, and that's the nicest way I can put it.

We have an all-volunteer military in which people who signed up, and of whom over 2,000,000 have now served in combat theaters since 2001.  Over 800,000 have served at least two tours in a combat theater.  Many thousands (the Pentagon won't release the numbers, but best-guess estimates are around 125-150,000) have had their tours of duty involuntarily extended under "stop-loss orders."

Over 10,000 of those folks have died, and somewhere on the order of 70,000 have been wounded. 

Between 300-400,000 of those soldiers have returned home with Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome; only half of those have received treatment.  

Military suicides are at their highest levels in American history.  Military divorce rates are many points above the civilian norm.

Congress has repeatedly cut not only services to soldiers on active duty, but benefits for veterans.

The composition of the US military--specifically in the enlisted ranks--is still disproportionate poor, disproportionately Hispanic, and disproportionately African-American, because a high percentage of enlistees join when their are no other jobs available.

You compare them to people who have "lost their jobs during the economic downturn."

Again, you are an idiot playing phoney equivalence games that you apparently don't understand.

People who have lost their jobs during the economic downturn have not been placed in harm's way on repeated occasions so that your ungrateful ass could sleep at night.

People who have lost their jobs during the economic downturn haven't generally lost arms, legs, eyes, or genitalia blown off by IEDs, while you tapped at your keyboard pretending you were contributing to society.

People who have lost their jobs during the economic downturn haven't been separately by half a planet from their families who lived in fear for months and years that they might never see them again, while you decided that people renting mobile homes were more deserving of government protection and support than them.

People who have lost their jobs during the economic downturn as the equivalent of veterans?

You are an idiot.

Don't get me wrong:  I oppose the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and Yemen and Somalia and Uganda and Pakistan and Libya, and I'd love the opportunity to cut the Defense budget and stop sending our young people over there to kill and be killed.

But I am not going to spit on the young people who put their asses on the line so that people like you can compare what happens to them in Iraq and Afghanistan to being laid off from a civilian job.

I see them every semester:  husbands and wives who come into my classes and casually say, "Doc, can I finish this course up early--I'm due to ship out to Afghanistan in early April."

Or the former Marine who walks with a limp and has a speech impediment probably related to all those fresh scars running down the side of his face.

Or the Phamacist's Assistant who came home from her second tour in Afghanistan to discover that her non-military husband had bolted, taking her two kids to parts unknown.

"Another protected class"?

You make me sick.

Comments

Hube said…
A very thorough -- and needed -- fisking, Steve. Well done.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba