Skip to main content

Kowalko and Jaques recycle five-year-old State single-payer plan as election-year gambit

Don't kid yourself.  Even the friendly audience at Delawareliberal knows that John Kowalko and Earl Jaques have not introduced HB 392 (Single-payer health care) in a serious attempt to get it passed this year.


El Somnabulo portrays it as "essentially a ’shot across the bow’ for next year," but the comment by Democratic nominee for Health Insurance Commissioner, Mitch Crane, is more instructive.  Mitch immediately jumps on the idea of endorsing single-payer healthcare, a move that is of course completely unrelated to his election campaign, right?


Sure, any moment now they will be re-assuring us that this is all about principle and not about creating an election issue out of a bill that is actually at least five years old.


That's right.  Virtually the same bill, Dr. Floyd McDowell's old single-payer plan that was SB 177 back in 2007 is back yet again.  (At the time this blog had just started and nobody was really reading it yet, I dissected that bill.)


It's the same bill, down to the same Delaware Health Security Authority that McDowell proposed.


At a quick read I cannot even see where it has been materially changed from the original edition.


So this is not new, and it was not terribly popular except with a few folks the first time around.


Here's how Liberalgeek of Delawareliberal himself dismissed the idea about six months ago, in his preliminary obituary for Occupy Delaware:
Delaware has a number of these helpful oldsters that want to grind the same old axes that they have been grinding for decades. One of them has even been on several radio stations in the past week presenting their “demands”. I haven’t heard the demands, but I’ll gander a few guesses about what they are, Implementing Floyd McDowell’s single payer plan, satellite news access for everyone and the freeing of all Palestinian prisoners. I’m sure she has others, but I really can’t stand to listen to her spout off any more, and neither can anyone else.
So while Mitch Crane is posturing, and Kowalko/Jaques are preening, let's be realistic and admit that they haven't done anything particularly new or daring, and don't even seem to have bothered to do anything more than cut and paste something that somebody else wrote and never managed to build a consensus for . . . a long time ago.


What this is all about is what it is always all about . . . election year posturing.

Comments

delacrat said…
Steve,

Would you agree that every Delaware resident having single-payer health care is preferable to some Delaware residents not having any health care of any kind?

delacrat
delacrat

Honest answer (leaving the funding mechanism aside for the moment): I'd have to know whether the system compromised or reduced the quality of care to those who already have care now or not. (Did that make grammatical sense, I'm tired).

In other words, it is a cost benefit analysis. Show me the metric and I'll give you a straight answer.
tom said…
My answer to delacrat's question is posted on the LPD website.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba