Skip to main content

The "Crimes" of Angela Keaton


While it is fun to speculate which mommy issues M Carling might be laboring under or what went so wrong in Aaron Starr’s potty training, this is about whether we are part of the libertarian movement or merely an adjunct to the GOP death machine.


Announcing that I work for Antiwar is like Jolie and Pitt announcing they are fucking. Both pretentious and obvious.


New staff piece of ass, Casey. Dark, young and easy prey for a cougar like myself.


Donny Ferguson is here as well. I felt him up once when I was drunk. Reform Caucus people are so uptight.


The Admiral keeps staying hello. Must be the dress. Tomorrow, BTP tank top and thong…no I’ll be wearing pants.


Funny, I always thought the Libertarian movement was about less government and more personal freedom, not the rule-mongering and petty jackassery occurring at the LNC, where people like to pretend their making decisions about a party that controls millions of votes and billions of dollars.

Just goes to show you how wrong you can be.

Near as I can tell right now, convoluted arguments about the sanctity of Executive Session (and I work for a university and live in a State where Executive Session is abused for the purpose of opacity on a daily basis) set aside, Angela is guilty of:

1. Lacking a herd instinct

2. Having a libido

3. Writing sharp-tongued, funny prose

4. Asking too many questions of people who really do have things to hide

Anarchist bitch.

Off with her fucking head [pun intended].

It is now officially time for the Libertarian movement to enter the post Libertarian National Committee phase of its existence.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
The LNC makes me physically sick.
September 10, 2008 at 1:22 PM
a most peculiar nature said…
Ditto on what Jason Gatties said. The LNC has become a caricature of itself.
September 10, 2008 at 6:50 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...
31 comments
Read more