The cost of Medicare is also ... uninsured children?

Richard Drooling has an amazingly original op-ed in the NYT that includes something to piss off everybody on all sides of the health care debate [that's my standard for an excellent piece of work].

This is the sentence that struck me:

Eight million children have no health insurance, but their parents pay 3 percent of their salaries to Medicare to make sure that seniors get the very best money can buy in prescription drugs for everything from restless leg syndrome to erectile dysfunction, scooters and end-of-life intensive care.

I have to admit that I had never thought of that one. Let's unpack it.

Nearly 22% of non-elderly uninsured families earn more than $40K per year. About 5% of non-elderly uninsured families earn more than $80K per year.

Those families, who cannot afford to pay for their own children to be insured, pay as much as $1,200-$2,400/year in Medicare taxes to provide national health insurance for seniors.

This makes sense, exactly how?

I'm sure someone will be glad to explain it to me, the reason why senior citizens automatically deserve the power of the State to be used to transfer money from families who cannot afford to pay for their own children's health insurance.

Holding breath.

Comments

Brian Shields said…

Everyone who is uninsured is paying for the health insurance of seniors. I am paying 3%, My employer is matching my 3%. Making only $18k/year between my employer and myself we are shelling out $1100/year towards Medicare.

My company held health insurance plan, which I cannot afford, costs $220/month, or $2640/year. (My employer pays half of the cost, for what is very good coverage)

If I could opt out of Medicare, and put that money towards my own health insurance plan, I would only have to shell out an additional $30 a week to pay for my company held health insurance plan.

August 18, 2009 at 10:21 PM

Tyler Nixon said…

Wealth redistribution at its finest.

August 19, 2009 at 8:35 AM

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

Search This Blog