Skip to main content

Delaware depending on "robbery by the Government" to fund state programs, one DEFAC member charges

I know that writers at the New Journal very often do not control the titles of their stories, so I'm giving this one the title I hope that Jonathan Starkey would have written (had he enjoyed a free hand), rather than calling it, "Delaware relies on iffy money."

Business groups and lawmakers are raising red flags over the state’s increasing reliance on so-called abandoned property – the uncashed corporate checks and inactive savings accounts nowfunding an oversized portion of Delaware’s cash-strapped budget.
The Delaware Department of Finance expects to collect $631 million from abandoned property next year, up 29 percent. With traditional business and personal taxes still sagging in the wake of the recession, abandoned property collections are expected to fund 15 percent of regular state spending, say projections – up from just 3 percent back in the 1990s.
Delaware, which has also come under fire for aggressively pursuing unclaimed cash, spends about $30 million annually going after themoney. That bill includes millions in payments to third-party auditors who pore over corporate books for unclaimed cash that can be escheated – turned over to the state.
By comparison, Maryland collected just $78 million last year in similar revenues.

Disturbing, but here, however, is what should have been the "money" paragraph used for the title:
Gary Simpson, a leading state Republican who sits on the Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council, which provides budget estimates to the state, called Delaware’s reliance on abandoned property revenues “a scary situation. It’s an unsustainable source of revenue, in my opinion,” he said. Even worse, Simpson added, “I think people look at it as sort of a robbery by the government.”
Read the whole thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?