Skip to main content

Paul Krugman: Opposition to health care reform is racism

OK, if it is fair (and it surely is) to go after Sarah Palin for her opportunistic nutjob evocation of Death Panels attempting to snuff poor Tryg, then it must also be fair to point out that Paul Krugman has hit a new low in characterizing opposition to President Obama's health insurance reforms as indicative of racism:

But they're probably reacting less to what Mr. Obama is doing, or even to what they've heard about what he's doing, than to who he is. [h/t Hube]


This is not, of course, without precedent for Krugman who only recently characterized any legislator who voted against cap-and-trade as a Traitor.

I say it was time to bring out the adults on both sides, except that I can't find any adults in the GOP these days, and the adults in the Democratic Party have apparently sold out to one of the industries they are supposed to be regulating.

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
You make it sound as if Krugman is calling just anyone who opposes health care reform a racist. He seems to be calling those who show up at public meetings and engage in mob like tactics as racially motivated on the suppositions that they are also birthers and birthers are racist.

I grant his suppositions come with scant evidence, but he is definitely not arguing that just anyone who opposes health care reform is racially motivated.
Nancy Willing said…
Dana's clarification is an important one. There is evidence of racist sentiments being tossed around --incidents from the mini mobbers filmed at some of these events. Krugman should have linked to it. He is better than this.
Anonymous said…
Krugman is and was right on many issues. I stand with Dana on this one, Krugman sees the rascism written all over this so called "Obama plan". Firstly it is NOT Obamas plan its the Senate/Congressional committee plans and every one of them falls short. If Obama wants to win in 4 years, he better wake up and start listening to the doctors/nurses at PNHP.org, and his own Doctor of 20 years. Progressives are determined to vote against any plan that does not permit single payer to be enacted at least in the states. They will submit to a "co-op" pooling crap that is untested, unregulated and unlicenced. I would hope liberaterians would join progessives in making sure the insurance companies are thrown to side of the road, and support the only option that 30 nations already have. We need to get the corporations out of the business of paying for health care. Those monies should be given as raises, or for new hires...thats how we expand our economy and create new jobs.
Nancy Willing said…
Steve, I got a few of those same spammers on my site today. I hope we aren't going to get slammed.

They would have had to go through word verification on your site...hmmm.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...