OK, if it is fair (and it surely is) to go after Sarah Palin for her opportunistic nutjob evocation of Death Panels attempting to snuff poor Tryg, then it must also be fair to point out that Paul Krugman has hit a new low in characterizing opposition to President Obama's health insurance reforms as indicative of racism:
This is not, of course, without precedent for Krugman who only recently characterized any legislator who voted against cap-and-trade as a Traitor.
I say it was time to bring out the adults on both sides, except that I can't find any adults in the GOP these days, and the adults in the Democratic Party have apparently sold out to one of the industries they are supposed to be regulating.
But they're probably reacting less to what Mr. Obama is doing, or even to what they've heard about what he's doing, than to who he is. [h/t Hube]
This is not, of course, without precedent for Krugman who only recently characterized any legislator who voted against cap-and-trade as a Traitor.
I say it was time to bring out the adults on both sides, except that I can't find any adults in the GOP these days, and the adults in the Democratic Party have apparently sold out to one of the industries they are supposed to be regulating.
Comments
I grant his suppositions come with scant evidence, but he is definitely not arguing that just anyone who opposes health care reform is racially motivated.
They would have had to go through word verification on your site...hmmm.