Skip to main content

Libertarian shorts from around the nation

A round-up of Libertarian electoral news pieces too brief for me to post individually (at least this late at night):

Deathwatch North Carolina notices (without endorsing) North Carolina Gubernatorial candidate Mike Munger in a positive way:

DW was recently contacted by the Delaware Libertarian blog with a request to spread the word about NC gubernatorial candidate Dr. Michael Munger, who opposes the death penalty. DW does not endorse candidates for political office.


It gets him on the record with death penalty opponents.

In Georgia, Senatorial candidate Allen Buckley takes incumbent Saxby Chambliss to task for supporting earmarks and other pork:

Buckley said: “If elected, I’ll take a no earmarks, no pork, no subsidies pledge, and I will fight to permanently eliminate these wasteful expenditures from federal budgets. I would not vote for a bill such as the housing relief bill that Saxby Chambliss has voted for, as it rewards irresponsibility and increases the debt burden on future generations.” Buckley also said: “I hereby challenge Mr. Chambliss and the ultimate Democratic nominee to a debate on the prudence of earmarks, pork, subsidies, means of changing the tax and entitlements systems, and the financial soundness of continuously increasing federal spending and deficits in light of the GAO’s warnings.”


In Indiana's 9th Congressional District, Dr. Eric Schansberg rises from 4 to 5% in the polls, and has to referee the ongoing spat between his opponents over who conducted the nastiest campaign in 2006, and who will debate or share town meeting forums with whom:

Dr. Eric Schansberg said: “Baron [Hill] needs to look in the mirror. Both of them were responsible for the nasty campaigns they ran in 2006. Baron needs to apologize as well—not only to Mike [Sodrel], but to everyone in the 9th District—for subjecting us to so much mud-slinging and name-calling like ‘Millionaire Mike’. I commend Mike for extending the olive branch. Maybe if they both take responsibility and apologize, we can go forward and have an honorable campaign this time.”

On the debates, Dr. Schansberg said, “Even though it was completely hypocritical, I understand why Baron wouldn’t debate gas prices earlier this summer. But since Baron demanded a lot of debates in 2006 and since he’s so good at it, I’m sure he’ll have enough character and confidence to offer at least the same three debates we had then—in Bloomington, New Albany, and Jasper. I look forward to many opportunities to debate and discuss the issues that are important to the voters of the 9th District.”


In Texas's District 52 (State House), Lillian Simmons has been recognized by Americans for Prosperity for signing the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) pledge, promising that if elected, she will support the following:

First, the state government’s budget should not grow faster than the family budget.

Second, decisions about new taxes and spending projects should be made by taxpayers.


Election Advantage notes that in Montana the race between John McCain and Barack Obama has abruptly tightened into a 47-47 tie, and that the Libertarian vote (especially with Stan Jones running for Governor and drawing a consistent 3% in the polls) may prove decisive:

Something to keep an eye on here could be Libertarian Bob Barr, as 5% of Republicans but only 1% of Democrats say they would currently vote for a 3rd party candidate. It doesn't sound like a lot, but in the 2006 Senate race here, Democrat Jon Tester won by .87% while Libertarian Stan Jones won 2.55%.


Politics continues to get more and more interesting as we stumble closer to November.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...