Skip to main content

The good news is that they are already starting to go after Libertarians, and next it will be Gary Johnson

Ron Paul and his supporters know how this works.

(With apologies to anything Gandhi may or may not have said.)

First they ignore you:  no polls, no media coverage, not even any hit pieces.  They hope you will die and go away.

Then they attack the ideology as "fringe," or "populist," or "peculiar," or "naive," or even "racist," or "dangerous."

They do this first because attacking the message does not require them to build up the name recognition of the messenger.

Next, they's attack the candidate or the spokesperson--for anything from speaking style to personal quirks.

Finally, if that all fails, they will attack the followers of the movement as hicks, thugs, elitists, racists, reactionaries--whatever can be made to stick.

Usually, if you survive all that, you're getting close to breaking through.

So these are the for steps:  ignore, attack the ideology, attack the leader, attack the followers.

Ron Paul has moved through all four steps, and ironically, it is necessary to move through all these steps because that is the only way to become nationally known outside the confines of the two parties.

Gary Johnson is now moving from step one (ignoring him) to step two (attacking the ideology).

Offered, as Rod Serling used to say, for your amusement, a small helpful of recent attacks on libertarianism:

Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times attacks libertarians as willing to sell virtually anything, even if doing so compromises honor, morals, and culture.  My favorite line, however, is his major Freudian slip about how our society does have certain limits on these barbarous practices [emphasis added]:
We do, of course, place some boundaries on markets. I can’t buy the right to cut off your leg for my amusement. Americans can sell blood, but (perhaps mistakenly) we don’t allowmarkets for kidneys and other organs, even though that would probably save lives.
You would think he might have edited that last sentence out (I know I would have, had I been writing the piece).

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune argues that libertarianism is a kind of ideological fantasy that is only popular when Republicans are out of power, because the idea of limited government plainly does not work.  My favorite line from this diatribe is
Libertarians seem to ignore the difference between campaigning and governing.
That line is really interesting (and should be a signal for everyone involved in the Gary Johnson campaign) because in 2012 it is the Libertarians who are actually running the presidential candidate with the most experience governing, and the most success at governing.  Gary Johnson has more executive experience than Barack Obama and Mitt Romney combined.  And to make their point about Libertarians not wanting to govern, they will eventually move to attack his record.

HuffPost has up a race-baiting piece, "Why are there so few Latino Libertarians?" that does everything except call Libertarians elitist racists.  Wait a minute--strike that--the post does effectively call Libertarians elitist racists:
Libertarianism is still overwhelmingly the privilege of white men, who have a cultural advantage over other groups, regardless of what economic class they were born into. As such, they may believe they have achieved success solely through their own initiative. They may be blind to all the help they received, especially if their consciences are clear and they never discriminate against other ethnicities. They are certain they can do anything they set their minds to, because quite frankly, they often have done so (with society's help, of course).
This is just the beginning.

But it is a hopeful beginning, because it means that in the bowels of the MSM, and in the war rooms of the Democratic and Republican campaigns they are feeling the first twinges in their guts.  Gary Johnson might make the race unpredictable:  he could throw North Carolina to Romney, Wisconsin to Obama, and even (perish the thought) conduct a successful "favorite son" campaign in New Mexico.

So they are going to have to try to marginalize him, and they'll try to do that by taking control of his message away from us.

It is both an opportunity and a threat.

If we can survive this, it's truly game on, and we're in the big time.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Libertarian Party Presidential Ticket of 2 Term New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson & Judge James Gray for VP is the best & most Qualified Constitutionalist Presidential Ticket that We The People have had in the last 100 years to vote for & elect as POTUS & VPOTUS & That also goes for the Libertarian Party down Ballot candidates also for the U.S. House & Senate & At The State & local levels too.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba