Skip to main content

Romney to make major education speech: odds are what we'l get is warmed-over NCLB

Your first clue is that Governor Mitt Romney has nothing new to offer beyond more Federal intrusion into public education is that he's rolling out his thoughts on the matter in a speech today to the US Chamber of Commerce.  The Chamber has been the major national backer of every top-down, Federally mandated education "reform" since high-stakes testing and national standards in the 1990s.  (The Chamber originally opposed NCLB because its accountability provisions were too "weak.")

Your second clue is that Romney has named a special group of advisors on education that include former Secretary of Education Rod Paige (the guy who brought America "No Child Left Behind"); at least six former Bush administration senior US DOE under-, deputy, and assistant secretaries (all of whom drink the proper kool-aid); and a handful of individuals who own or direct private educational entities who exist to sell consulting services or manage charter schools.

On the other hand, it's almost impossible to tell exactly what Romney might say about education, because--like pretty much everything else--he's held a variety of positions over time:

Mitt Romney:  It's Wednesday,
somebody remind me which form
of Federal intrusion into public
education I'm advocating today.

Romney's positions on education have evolved over time. He once supported abolishing the Education Department but reversed that position as a presidential candidate in 2007. At the time, he said he came to see the value of the federal government in "holding down the interests of the teachers' unions" and putting kids and parents first.
Romney also changed his position on the Bush-era education overhaul known as "No Child Left Behind." He said he supported the law as a candidate in 2007, but he has since generally come out against the policy many conservatives see as an expansion of the federal government.
Romney continues to support the federal accountability standards in the law, however. And he has said the student testing, charter-school incentives and teacher evaluation standards of Obama's "Race to the Top" competition "make sense," although the federal government should have less control over education. The campaign in recent days has emphasized his support for charter schools while governor of Massachusetts, a theme likely to play out in Wednesday's address.

In other words, while I will carry the results of his speech, the smart money bets that a Mitt Romney presidency means more ideologically and politically driven Federal intrusion into public education.

Comments

yep, EPIC-fail in wait.
Unknown said…
Looking for a help with your next speech, anxiety or panic attacks ?
Have no fear, just enter here:
http://severe.panicattackguides.com
Unknown said…
Looking for a help with your next speech, anxiety or panic attacks ?
Have no fear, just enter here:
http://severe.panicattackguides.com

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?