Skip to main content

Just really, really bad history: Stephen B. Young and the erroneous connection of Libertarianism to Social Darwinism

Don't know quite where to start with this one, since there so much counter-factual goodness here.

Let's just do the first substantive paragraph of an idiotic essay entitled "Is It raining Libertarians, or what?"
Out of their experience after the Civil War, America's Republicans came to believe in a philosophy called Social Darwinism, with its call for individual self-reliance, free markets and limited government. Most Americans who rejected Social Darwinism became Democrats
Ah, well, this would be interesting if it were at all remotely true.

The Republican ideology of individual self-reliance, free markets, and limited government predated the Civil War.  In modern terms, this is called "Free Labor Ideology," and the ground-breaking research on that was done by Eric Foner twenty-six years ago in Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men,  The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War.

The generalized breakdown between Social Darwinists in the GOP and those the author will later refer to as progressives never actually occurred--at least not in the way he suggests.

The identification of Herbert Spenser as the Father of Social Darwinism was an intellectual construct created by Richard Hofstader in 1944.  While Hofstadter's thesis was influential for several decades, it has  been pretty thoroughly debunked.

But, hey, this is an election year, so it is fair game to say anything, right?

Comments

Dana Garrett said…
While it is certainly.true that libertarian thought stems from classical liberalism, it nevertheless remains the.case that Social.Darwinism reinforces libertarian capitalistic thought.
Dana

Social Darwinism, historically speaking, is an effect and not a cause. The Free Labor ideology predates it by almost 30 years, and in the end social darwinism never became more than a sub-set of that ideology.

The connection between libertarian philosophy and social darwinism is corretative, perhaps, but certainly not causative. The causal link existed primarily in the mind of Richard Hofstadter, who was a great writer but a highly overrated historian.

None of which voids my main point which is that this guy gets his facts wrong all over the place.

Given that, I really don't care what his conclusions are.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?