Skip to main content

A Modest Proposal for Changing the Structure of Education Goverance in Delaware

Eat the children.

OK, now that I've gotten that out of my system, here goes:

1.  Public election of State Board of Education members to occur concurrently with existing school board elections in May.  State Board electoral districts to based on school-age population, and candidates must live within the districts they represent.  No at-large voting.  Non-partisan elections.  No employee of a school or school district within the SB electoral district, or employee of any company or corporation with a direct contractual, financial interest in school operations to be eligible for service on the State Board of Education.  Four-year terms.

2.  Remove the position of Secretary of Education from the cabinet and restore the State Superintendent of Public Education.  State Superintendent to be selected by, and serve at the pleasure of, the State Board of Education.  The State Board of Education to approve all employment contracts within the Delaware Department of Education.

3.  Local School Boards to have the right of direct appeal of any adverse ruling by DE DOE to the State Board of Education.

4. DE DOE to be converted into an agency that is primarily concerned with assisting school districts in compliance with Federal regulations and State laws.  DOE to be limited by statute to expending no more than 10% of any Federal funding for public education to cover administrative expenses.

5. The Neighborhood Schools Act to be repealed.

6. DCAS or other standardized tests to be limited for use in statistical data collection, and not to overturn local decisions on student performance, graduation, or promotion

7.  Local School Boards to become the primary authorizing mechanism for charter schools.


We've tried top-down and it didn't work.

Time to try bottom up.

Comments

So,the key to #2 is: does not report to Governor

#6 add: or teacher evaluation
#1 change the board composition 9 members to retain focus on local constituent service.

Winner!
pandora said…
Love #5. What a disaster that was.

We've overcomplicated education. Most schools are doing just fine, but if we admit that then the business community wouldn't be able to put their claws into all that lovely tax payer money.

What we need to focus on is the high poverty population. Thus far, that population has only been used as the crabs others use to hoist themselves out of the bucket - and then those who escape the bucket sit back and wallow in their awesomeness, pretending they didn't step on the heads of other children to escape.
Hube said…
#5 certainly wasn't the unmitigated disaster that forced busing was, that's for sure.

Unfortunately, what dogmatists on both sides forget: 1) there was a voluntary busing plan enacted by lawmakers before Judge Schwartz said "forget it," and 2) Smith's law deviates from what conservatives are supposed to be about regarding education -- local control. I once asked him just this and got no satisfactory answer. IOW, as pandora said in another thread, Brandywine "skirted" the law and effectively argued that its then-current feeders were its "neighborhood." But if conservatives were true to their principles, they should have left it up to districts to do what they wished.
Hube said…
... and BSD wouldn't have even had to argue such.
Coolspringer said…
Awesome.

I'm also very interested in some formal establishment of Local School Councils, especially in the city. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_School_Councils Not unlike charter boards, I suppose?

And what about choice management or SES balance policy & incentives? Possible at DOE level? Up to district school boards? Individual schools?

P.S. Was busing an unmitigated disaster? Was that mainly in Christina? I know I had a pretty great experience, in Red Clay. And I imagine the majority of Red Clay schools - those that existed in that period - were enjoying better days.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?