Skip to main content

Ron Paul supporters: How are you going to campaign and vote for Mitt Romney when he thinks . . . .


That we're not spending enough to fight America's wars.

Maybe a picture will help.  

This is how US military spending compares to the rest of the world:

Yessir, Mr. Governor Romney, we've certainly gutted defense spending
under the current administration.  Thank GOD you're around to promise
that you will increase it!!!!!!!

Remember:  Mitt Romney says it's not enough to outspend the next fourteen nations (many of whom are our allies) combined, or for the US to spend 41% of the world's military budget.

He wants us to SPEND MORE.

This is what the US defense budget will look when Gary Johnson sends his defense budget to Congress, with a 43% cut:

Wow! That's quite a difference, isn't it?

When Mitt Romney refuses to go along with Dr Paul's principled stand on military non-interventionism and reduced spending of America's wars, and becomes the GOP nominee anyway, who are you going to vote for?

Mitt Romney:  who thinks that the largest military budgets in the history of the planet are too small (Figure 1)?

OR

Gary Johnson:  who thinks we need to cut our miltiary budget in 2013 by 43% (Figure 2)?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba