Skip to main content

At the intersection of Delaware and Gary Johnson

Expect to start seeing this
more often.
On his C-Span interview the other day, Gary Johnson said something that bothered me enough to start thinking about it hard.

He was talking about cutting the Federal budget by 43%.  One of the things he said was that then, in areas like education, the Feds would send the states block grants for 43% less, but with all the strings removed.

Realizing that this is sound-bite campaign rhetoric, and that the devil is always in the details, I wanted to see how that would work out in practice.

Delaware was awarded $112 for Race to the Top, with--of course--multiple, even strangling Federal strings attached.

Cutting that by 43% would have meant that Delaware only received $63,840,000.

But with no strings, look what could have happened:

DEDOE could have kept $6.84 for itself (I'm sure they could have found something bureaucratically interesting to do with the money) and handed each school district in Delaware $3 million.

Free and clear:  a one-time windfall of $3 million.

For Laurel, it would have meant not having to lay off teachers and other employees, or cut programs.  AND the district could then have banked the remaining $2.58 million.

For Red Clay it would have meant that Lewis, Mote, Richardson Park, Heritage, and Warner could each have received $500-600K to really push programs for the district's most seriously "at risk" population.

For Christina, think about how much more the new Early Childhood Education Center could do with $3 million.

Yes, I know that some of the money would have been frittered away at different administrative levels.

But I am willing to bet heavily the more money would have ended up in more place to do more good for more students if Delaware had received just under $64 million free and clear rather than $112 million with Partnership Zones, data consultants, incentive programs, et al, ad nauseum.

Am I willing to endorse all education funds being block granted directly to the states at such a discount?

Not quite yet, for two reasons.

Reason Number One:  I barely trust DE DOE any more than I trust US DOE.  That's why I figured I might as well count on the bureaucrats skimming 10% of the money at the outset.

Reason Number Two:  There are areas in which states and localities do require some oversight.  Special education funding and services comes to mind here, as well as gender equity in athletics.  But I think that those (and comparable) issues are a much smaller portion of what needs to be the government role in education, and that returning from having two cabinet level offices (Health and Human Services plus Education) to one (Health, Education, and Welfare) would not be a disaster by any mean.s

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...
26 comments
Read more