Skip to main content

The dumbest platitude written about today's school board races . . . .

. . . . is on the News Journal editorial page.

Here it is (again, can't find the link; maybe they are ashamed of it):
That's why smart special interests delight in such callous voter interest about who serves on school boards.  They turn up in enough numbers to get their candidates seated and they hang around long after polling has ended.  They are the citizen journalists or effective gadflies who are front an center at monthly board meetings.
So much wrong in three sentences, where do I begin?

If Voices 4 Delaware and DSEA agreed on just one thing, it would be that they are both trying to increase the number of people voting.  At least I think so.  Otherwise, no rational theory at all would explain spending thousands of dollars to push some candidates and attack others, right?

So the first paragraph, that suggests that "smart special interests" are happy about low voter turn-out would seem to be, uh, just stupid.

The second sentence says that those special interests "turn up in enough numbers to get their candidates seated."  What's wrong with this?  As Frederika Jenner correctly pointed out, prior to about 2008 or 2009 in Red Clay (and it was the same in CSD), far too many school board seats were handed out without any election, because only one candidate self-nominated.

Then there are the people who "hand around long after polling has ended."

Pay attention, bloggers, because I think in its own patrician down-the-nose way the News Journal is going to talk about us:  "citizen journalists or effective gadflies"--that's us, right?

I really like that term "citizen journalists," don't you?  It has just the right amount of disdain, and it is just properly coded so bloggers will know we're being dissed, but nobody else will be directed toward the blogs.

"Gadflies" is another great dismissive term:  think about what it implies about the motivations, intelligence, and scope of everyone from PTA leaders, to DSEA members, to Vision proponents.  They're all just insignificant insects darting around the educational light bulb that is the school board.

The reality is that, if anyone really wanted coverage of all the back-and-forth about issues, about funding, about scandals--if anyone actually wanted to read the Delaware PTA letter, or the Attorney General's response, or the stats on contributions--then the only place you could get them this year was pretty much on the blogs.

We all covered--in our own piratical, sometimes coarse but almost always passionate and entertaining way--the story that the newspaper wouldn't tell.


Nichole Dobo aside (and we all think of you as one of us, Nichole, but we won't tell the NJ editorial board), the WNJ coverage of the contest between different educational factions has gone completely unreported.  Thousands, probably tens of thousands, of dollars have been thrown into this year's school board races, especially in Red Clay and CSD, but if you didn't read the blogs you probably didn't know about it.

Which is exactly the way the dead tree media would like to keep it.

Comments

pandora said…
That is one mess of a paragraph. I had to read it several times to make sure I understood their meaning.

I agree that Voices 4 Delaware and DSEA want to increase voter turn-out... at least for their candidate! ;-)

The News Journal is trying to dance around the issue. They are hinting at things that, god forbid, they'd ever, you know, report on.

Citizen journalist? Gadflies? Oh my, they are above it all, aren't they?
I just learned that a school board is a light bulb.

Awesome.
found the link: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20120508/OPINION11/305080053/Smart-voters-don-t-miss-school-board-elections?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Home|s

took about an hour.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?