Skip to main content

How to differentiate Gary Johnson from Obama and Romney

The San Francisco Examiner has an intriguing article up regarding the "mirror" attacks going back and forth between President Obama and Governor Romney.
Romeny and Obama: separated by
what they have in common?

Essentially, they are both accusing each other of exactly the same things.

What I found interesting, however, was what happens when you enter Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson into the equation.

So what I did was to take the SF Examiner's examples, and then add Gary Johnson in my own words (in BLUE).

Here goes:
Gary Johnson actually
sweats (and he was in
GQ, too).
"Out of touch" with ordinary Americans.
Obama: Cloistered in the White House. Hangs out with celebrities, acting "cool." Doesn't understand the real world because "he spent too much time at Harvard," according to Romney, who earned two Harvard degrees himself.
Romney: Grew up wealthy, with a governor for a father. Worth $200 million or more. He's the kind of guy who had a Swiss bank account and wants a car elevator for his beach house, the Democrats note.
Johnson:  the son of a school teacher who made his money by starting "Big J" Construction.  Fitness nut.  Rides a bike, runs triathalons, climbed Mount Everest.

Or this:
Bad for the middle class.
Obama: Failed to deliver on his promises to help Americans "struggling to find good jobs and make ends meet," the Romney camp says. Median household income is down, unemployment up since he took office.
Gary Johnson:  on a day when
he wasn't scheduled to be in GQ.
Romney: Wants to reduce taxes on the wealthy while devastating Medicare and cutting education, health care and other programs the middle class need, Democrats charge. Obama says that amounts to "social Darwinism."

Johnson:  Job creation rate of 11.6% per year as Governor of New Mexico; increased spending on education while leaving the State with a budget surplus.





Then there's this:
Suspiciously secretive.
Obama: Believing his microphone off, assured the Russian president he would have "more flexibility" after Election Day. Obama will reveal "his true positions only after the election is over," Romney says. Republicans predict he would tack left on the environment, spending, gay rights and other issues.
Gary Johnson: I inhaled. Don't
tell anybody.
Romney: Told campaign donors of plans to cut or eliminate the housing and education agencies as well as others — ideas he hasn't disclosed publicly. "What's Mitt hiding?" Democrats ask, demanding more about his personal tax returns and investments, too.
Johnson:  Told everybody in the country he used to smoke dope.  Also told everybody in the country he applied for a concealed carry license.

And, then again, this:
If you think terminal cancer patients
shouldn't get to smoke pot, then
I guess Gary is too radical.


Too extreme.
Obama: Hopes to create "a European-style social welfare state," Romney says, and "put free enterprise on trial." Endorsing Romney, Newt Gingrich called Obama "the most radical, leftist president in American history."
Romney: Referred to himself as "severely conservative." He's "extreme on women's issues," Democrats contend. Obama places him to the right of Reagan and suggests he's akin to Barry Goldwater.
Johnson:  Advocates for marijuana legalization (over 50% of American public agrees with him); getting the hell out of Afghanistan soonest (69% of Americans agree); and for marriage equality (53% of Americans agree).  Yep, the man is just too damn radical.


And this:

Unable to fix the economy.
Obama: Can't get the jobless rate below 8 percent. He "delayed the recovery and made it anemic," according to Romney, who says Obama lacks the private sector experience necessary to understand the economy.
Romney: As a venture capitalist, laid off workers and shipped jobs to Mexico, the Obama campaign says. Also created Massachusetts jobs more slowly than other governors of the time, Democrats note.
Johnson:  Inherited a deficit, left office with a surplus.  Highest job creation rate among contemporary governors.

And, finally, this:

Nobody Obama nor Romney
dares to say this, even though
69% of us want it.

Not up to foreign policy. 
Obama: Too weak to stand up to China or Russia or to stop Iran from getting a nuclear bomb, and too eager to apologize for the United States, Romney charges.
Romney: Likely to stumble into another misguided war, according to Vice President Joe Biden. Wouldn't have had the guts to send Navy SEALs into Pakistan to get Osama bin Laden, the Obama campaign suggests.
Johnson:  Actually goes with the evidence about Iran and nuclear weapons.  Promises to get out of Afghanistan.  Willing to consider humanitarian interventions but thinks that both Obama and Romney are far too interventionist.  Only candidate to propose cutting the military back to 2003 levels.
 These mirror dances would be more fun if the MSM actually ever included Johnson into the mix.

Comments

CFroh said…
Outstanding post, Delaware Libertarian! This took effort and should be shared widely. By the way, at the Libertarian Convention I met your state's LP Chair, Will McVay, and a couple other delegates. It would be awesome for Delaware to give its votes to Johnson this Fall!
Mr. Froh,

Thanks for the comment. Please share as widely as you can, and visit often. I am trying to put out a steady stream of solid Gary Johnson material every day, specifically with an eye toward doing two things: (a) generating more hits on key terms on search engines; and (b) to provide some of the grassroots-type material that I know the national campaign doesn't have time or resources to put out.

Help me pass the word to other state coordinators that The Delaware Libertarian will be in this for the long haul, and will be a dependable source of news regarding the Johnson/Gray campaign.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici