Skip to main content

Just a thought as we head into school-board elections. . . .

From the Freakonomics blog:


“Morality, by its very nature, makes it hard to study morality,” writes the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt. “It binds people together into teams that seek victory, not truth. It closes hearts and minds to opponents even as it makes cooperation and decency possible within groups.”
His new book is called The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion and it is absorbing on so many levels.
Visit the originan post, as Haidt answers questions from readers.
I stumbled across this today, and wondered:  "Why, in Delaware, where there are so many people concerned with public education that we actually have a statewide debate going on, do we refuse to credit that people on the other side of the question are good people with different ideas, instead of being bad people with different ideas?"
Why do we always attribute the opinions with which we disagree to venality, greed, malfeasance, and lack of compassion?
I've done it; so have you.
Next Tuesday, many of us (I hope many of us) will go to the polls and vote in school board elections.  I have my candidate; some of you who stop here support a different candidate, or will vote in a different district election.
I get the sense that much of this election comes down to voting against someone or something:  a PAC, a union, a charter school.
On Tuesday, if you vote, I'd like you to try to make up your mind to vote for something.
Vote for what you honestly think will be best for the kids in your district.
If you do that, I'm ok with however you cast your ballot.
And then, once a candidate has been elected, don't sit back and wait for them to fix the problem.
Whether your candidate won or not--help them.

Comments

Dana Garrett said…
What do you think of the Righteous Mind? I'm a little wary of it because I think that the meme that the American right and left are ideologically poles apart is a misnomer, one encouraged by powerful interests in the USA. It's hard for me to take the USA meta-division seriously given the wide agreement of the USA left and right compared to other potentially competing social and political options (e.g. libertarian socialism). Does the author discuss and account for the slight philosophical differences between USA conservatives and liberals?
May 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw
18 comments
Read more

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?
Post a Comment
Read more

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici
Post a Comment
Read more