Skip to main content

Libertarian NOMINEE Gary Johnson: GOP intolerant, homophobic

Winning nearly 70% of the votes on the first ballot at the Libertarian National Convention in Las Vegas today, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson wasted no time proving he is not going to run or govern as "Republican lite":
Gary Johnson, accepting the
Libertarian Party nomination
for President in Las Vegas.


"I believe the majority of americans are fiscally responsible and socially tolerant," Johnson told BuzzFeed in a phone interview. "I believe the majority of Americans could care less about whether or not there is a gay individual working in the Romney campaign." Romney's newly hired foreign policy spokesman Richard Grenell was openly gay, a fact that raised the ire of social conservatives, whose reaction resulted in Grenell's leaving the campaign.
"It speaks volumes to the intolerance that continues to be present in the Republican Party," Johnson said. He said he doesn't attach that intolerance to the majority of Republicans but to "the activists driving that agenda."
"That intolerance is why the world vilifies Republicans," Johnson continued. "It’s why I have never worn a Republican t-shirt in my life. There is a certain Republican dogma I just cannot defend. Homophobia is one of those issues."
Asked why he had spent so many years in the GOP before defecting to the Libertarian Party, Johnson explained:

Johnson said the only reason he's never been a registered Libertarian is because "I have a notion of governing and winning," and "I have a lot of Republican friends who have just had it with the Republican Party."
Pollster John Zogby
believes the Libertarian
Party could have a
significant impact on
this year's election.
 Governing and winning . . .  that's the trick in a Libertarian Party that has never broken 1,000,000 votes and only once in its 40-year history exceeded 1% of the vote in the General Election.


But Gary Johnson is pursuing what has been called the 15% strategy--attempting to amass enough support in major polls to be invited into the Presidential debates this fall, where sharing a stage with President Obama and Governor Romney could be the breakthrough moment he needs.


The strategy does not seem impossible, at least at this point, as Johnson has already showed up at 6% in some national polls; as high as 15% in his home state of New Mexico; and recently at 8% in Montana.


Recently, pollster John Zogby even suggested that Johnson's candor or marijuana legalization, gay rights, and abortion rights might steal some of the youth vote from President Obama.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Every time the LP candidate has made the requirements to be included in the debates, the bar gets raised.

At one time you had to be on the ballot on all 50 states. Harry Browne did that in 1996 and they changed the rules that you had to qualify for federal matching funds (to prove widespread support).

Harry Browne made that requirement in 2000 and they changed the rules to the new 15% number.

The 15% number is a new mark to meet. The rules will change in the middle of the game.

John Galt
kavips said…
Who will be Vice President?

(Anyone other than Sam Sloan,delegate from Minnesota: lol)...
kavips

California Superior Court Justice Jim Gray, a longtime Libertarian and proponent of ending the drug war, finding a real solution to immigration, and taking a more even-handed view of Palestinian rights.

See my introduction to him here

http://delawarelibertarian.blogspot.com/2012/04/who-is-judge-jim-gray-and-why-both-gary.html
kavips said…
That was fast. Just looked him up.

You have a good ticket this time. Just make sure your candidates weather the storm well, and don't appear as Bob Barr did, inhuman.

Republicans got that sewn up already.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...